|
| 1 | +# Contribution Guideline ESMF Visual Studio Code Plugin |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Thank you for your interest in contributing to the ESMF Visual Studio Code Plugin. Use this repository to |
| 4 | +contribute to |
| 5 | +the project as easy and transparent as possible, whether it is: |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +* Reporting a bug |
| 8 | +* Submitting a fix |
| 9 | +* Proposing new features |
| 10 | +* something else |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +The ESMF Visual Studio Code Plugin is developed in the context of the [Eclipse Semantic Modeling |
| 13 | +Framework](https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/dt.esmf/). It is based on the Semantic Aspect Meta |
| 14 | +Model (SAMM) and supports its use. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +# Contributing Source Code (using GitHub) |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +* We use this GitHub repository to track issues and feature requests. |
| 19 | +* For discussions specific to development, the preferred way is |
| 20 | + the [developer mailing list](https://accounts.eclipse.org/mailing-list/esmf-dev). |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## Branching |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +We follow |
| 25 | +the [Git branching guidance](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/git-branching-guidance?view=azure-devops). |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +More specifically the repository has the following branches: |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + name of branch | description |
| 30 | +-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| 31 | + `main` | Contains the latest state of the repository |
| 32 | + `v{version_number}-RC{rc_number}` | A "release candidate": A version that freezes major features and |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +can be considered a pre-release of the next full release. |
| 35 | +`v{version_number}` | A full release of the respective version. |
| 36 | +`feature/#{issue_number}-{feature_name}` | Contains the development on a specific feature and is |
| 37 | +intended to be merged back into the `main` branch as soon as possible. Note, that it is recommended |
| 38 | +for contributors to create and develop feature branches in a personal fork and not the upstream |
| 39 | +repository. |
| 40 | +`bug/#{issue_number}-{bug_name}` | Contains the development of (usually smaller) changes in files of |
| 41 | +the repository that do not introduce new functionality but fix mistakes, errors or inconsistencies. |
| 42 | +These branches should be merged back into the `main`branch as soon as possible. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +## Issues |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +We use the `Issues` feature of GitHub for tracking all types of work in the repository. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +We distinguish between the following types of issues; |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | + Issue Types | Description |
| 51 | +--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 52 | + `Bug Report` | This `Issue` is dedicated to reporting a problem. |
| 53 | + `Task` | This `Issue` is used for describing and proposing a new work item (e.g., a new feature) |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +If there are issues that link to the same topic, the creator of the issue shall mention those other tasks in the |
| 56 | +description. To group tasks that can belong together, one could further create an issue mentioning and describing |
| 57 | +the overall user story for the referenced tasks. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +## Pull Requests |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +Proposals for changes to the content of the repository are managed through Pull Requests (`PRs`). |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +### Opening Pull Requests |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +To open such a `PR`, implement the changes in a new `feature branch`. Each `PR` must reference an issue and follows the |
| 66 | +naming schema: `<issue-number>-<feature-name>`. For a new `PR` the target branch is the `main` branch while the source |
| 67 | +branch is your `feature branch` The `feature branch` branch should be developed in a fork of the upstream repository. |
| 68 | +So before working on your first feature, you need to create such a fork (e.g., by pressing the `Fork` button in the top |
| 69 | +right corner of the GitHub page) |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +When opening a `PR` please consider the following topics: |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +* optional: Rebase your development on the branch to which you plan to create the `PR`. |
| 74 | +* Each `PR` must be linked to an `Issue`: |
| 75 | + - Reference the `Issue` number in the name of your `feature branch` and the description of the `PR`. |
| 76 | + - Mention the `Issue` in one of the commit messages associated to the `PR` together with a GitHub keyword like |
| 77 | + `closes #IssueNumber` or `fixes #IssuesNumber`. For more details visit the |
| 78 | + [GitHub documentation on linking PR with Issues](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword) |
| 79 | +* Each `PR` should only contain changes related to a single work item. If the changes cover more than one work item or |
| 80 | + feature, then create one `PR` per work item. You may need to create new more specific `Issues` to reference if you |
| 81 | + split up the work into multiple `feature branches`. |
| 82 | +* Commit changes often. A `PR` may contain one or more commits. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +## Eclipse Development Process |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +This Eclipse Foundation open project is governed by the Eclipse Foundation Development Process and |
| 87 | +operates under the terms of the Eclipse IP Policy. |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +* https://eclipse.org/projects/dev_process |
| 90 | +* https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_IP_Policy.pdf |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +## Eclipse Contributor Agreement |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +In order to be able to contribute to Eclipse Foundation projects you must electronically sign the |
| 95 | +Eclipse Contributor Agreement (ECA). |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +* http://www.eclipse.org/legal/ECA.php |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +The ECA provides the Eclipse Foundation with a permanent record that you agree that each of your |
| 100 | +contributions will comply with the commitments documented in the Developer Certificate of Origin |
| 101 | +(DCO). Having an ECA on file associated with the email address matching the "Author" field of your |
| 102 | +contribution's Git commits fulfills the DCO's requirement that you sign-off on your contributions. |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +For more information, please see the Eclipse Committer Handbook: |
| 105 | +https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#resources-commit |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +## Commit Messages |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +Separate the subject from the body with a blank line because the subject line is shown in the Git |
| 110 | +history and should summarize the commit body. Use the body to explain what and why with less focus |
| 111 | +on the details of the how. This [blog post](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/#seven-rules) |
| 112 | +has more tips and details. Before you push your commits to a repository, you should squash your |
| 113 | +commits into one or more logical units of work, e.g., you should organize a new feature in a single |
| 114 | +commit. |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +## License Headers & Licensing |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +All files contributed require headers - this will ensure the license and copyright clearing at the |
| 119 | +end. Also, all contributions must have the same license as the source. The header should follow the |
| 120 | +following template: |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +``` |
| 123 | +/* |
| 124 | + * Copyright (c) {YEAR} {NAME OF COMPANY X} |
| 125 | + * Copyright (c) {YEAR} {NAME OF COMPANY Y} |
| 126 | + * |
| 127 | + * See the AUTHORS file(s) distributed with this work for additional |
| 128 | + * information regarding authorship. |
| 129 | + * |
| 130 | + * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public |
| 131 | + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this |
| 132 | + * file, You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. |
| 133 | + * |
| 134 | + * SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0 |
| 135 | + */ |
| 136 | +``` |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +When using the template, one must replace "{NAME OF COMPANY X}" with the name of the involved |
| 139 | +companies and "{YEAR}" with the year of the contribution. For each involved company you need a new |
| 140 | +line starting with "Copyright" as outlined in the example. |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +The example is taken from a Java source file. If your file is of another type you may have to adapt |
| 143 | +the comment syntax accordingly. |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +If you use third-party content (e.g., import / include ...), you are required to list each |
| 146 | +third-party content explicitly with its version number in the documentation and your pull-request |
| 147 | +comment. Please also check used third party material for license compatibility with the MPL-2.0. |
| 148 | +E.g. software licensed under GPL, AGPL or, a similar strong copy-left license cannot be approved. |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +# Code Conventions |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +The ESMF Visual Studio Code Plugin is written in Typescript. Please have a look into our [Code |
| 153 | +Conventions](CONVENTIONS.md). |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +## Versioning |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +We use Semantic Versioning to identify released versions of the ESMF Visual Studio Code Plugin. Semantic Versioning |
| 158 | +is |
| 159 | +documented [here](https://semver.org). It proposes to have a versioning number with the following |
| 160 | +elements: |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +```` |
| 163 | +Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: |
| 164 | +- MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, |
| 165 | +- MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner, and |
| 166 | +- PATCH version when you make backwards compatible bug fixes. |
| 167 | +Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format. |
| 168 | +```` |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +Whereas the Major version must be incremented if the API has backward-incompatible changes (e.g., has breaking changes), |
| 171 | +the Minor version must be changed if new backward-compatible features are introduced and, |
| 172 | +the Patch version must be incremented if backward-compatible bugfixes are introduced. |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +### Breaking Changes |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +For the definition of a breaking change, we follow the definition as in the [Microsoft REST API |
| 177 | +Guidelines](https://github.com/Microsoft/api-guidelines/blob/vNext/Guidelines.md#123-definition-of-a-breaking-change) |
| 178 | +which are licensed under [CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). This definition |
| 179 | +states: |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +```` |
| 182 | +Changes to the contract of an API are considered a breaking change. Changes that impact the backwards compatibility |
| 183 | +of an API are a breaking change. |
| 184 | +````` |
| 185 | +
|
| 186 | +### Version Syntax for Specific Environments |
| 187 | +
|
| 188 | +Git version tag |
| 189 | +
|
| 190 | +vX.Y.Z-[pre-release-identifier] |
| 191 | +
|
| 192 | +Examples: |
| 193 | +
|
| 194 | +v1.0.0-RC1, v1.0.0 |
| 195 | +
|
| 196 | +# Resources |
| 197 | +
|
| 198 | +* [For a Repo](https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork) |
| 199 | +* [Issue Creation](https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/creating-an-issue) |
| 200 | +* [PR Creation](https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request) |
0 commit comments