Skip to content

Possible misspelling of function name for changesForModelModication()#1941

Open
sderazo wants to merge 1 commit intoeclipse-pde:masterfrom
JoseRodriguez26:correct-spelling
Open

Possible misspelling of function name for changesForModelModication()#1941
sderazo wants to merge 1 commit intoeclipse-pde:masterfrom
JoseRodriguez26:correct-spelling

Conversation

@sderazo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sderazo sderazo commented Aug 21, 2025

The change from changesForModelModication() to changesForModelModification() (originally declared in the PDEModelUtility.java file) is being made to improve the coding and debugging experience for developers. One of the parameters that this function takes in is final ModelModification modification, which makes me think that Modication should be Modification instead. This would help save time with debugging since when I was working on Issue 1813, I saw that there was an error message with the function and I could not figure out what was wrong until I saw that I misspelled the function by one letter.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

  618 files  ±0    618 suites  ±0   49m 23s ⏱️ - 5m 47s
3 611 tests ±0  3 556 ✅ ±0   54 💤 ±0  1 ❌ ±0 
8 183 runs  ±0  8 043 ✅ ±0  139 💤 ±0  1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit ed7ee34. ± Comparison against base commit d9ad053.

The change from changesForModelModication() to changesForModelModification() (originally declared in the PDEModelUtility.java file) is being made to improve the coding and debugging experience for developers. One of the parameters that this function takes in is final ModelModification modification, which makes me think that Modication should be Modification instead. This would help save time with debugging since when I was working on Issue 1813, I saw that there was an error message with the function and I could not figure out what was wrong until I saw that I misspelled the function by one letter.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@laeubi laeubi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only internal so change looks fine

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants