Add reproducer for cyclic bundle dependencies caused by #2218

[ptziegler]

No description provided.

[laeubi]

@ptziegler many thanks - I'll take a look into it.

[github-actions]

Test Results

  357 files   -   444    357 suites   - 444   42m 30s ⏱️ - 12m 48s
1 134 tests  - 2 664  1 102 ✅  - 2 642  30 💤  - 24  1 ❌ +1  1 🔥 +1 
3 168 runs   - 7 992  3 073 ✅  - 7 924  91 💤  - 72  3 ❌ +3  1 🔥 +1 

For more details on these failures and errors, see this check.

Results for commit a8384dd. ± Comparison against base commit 368feba.

This pull request removes 2665 and adds 1 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit4 (JUnitPlatform) Fragment]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit4 (JUnitPlatform)]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit4 Fragment]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit4]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit5 Fragment]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit5]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit6 Fragment]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[JUnit6]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[Java 11 bundle with module limit]
JUnitRuntimeTests org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.tests.JUnitExecutionTest ‑ executeMethod[Using a 'test' source folder]
…

AllPDETests ClasspathResolutionTest ‑ testRequiredPluginsViaCapabilityForFragment

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[ptziegler]

I've also cleaned up the test a little bit to make better use of the ProjectUtils class, so that I don't have to edit the Manifest file directly.

[laeubi]

@ptziegler I included your testcase and a fix here:

• Do not follow generic requirements when computing the classpath #2256

[ptziegler]

@ptziegler I included your testcase and a fix here:

• Do not follow generic requirements when computing the classpath #2256

Awesome, thanks! 😄 Then this PR can be closed.

[merks]

Thank you for immediately taking helpful concrete steps toward a solution!! 🥇