|
| 1 | +.. |
| 2 | + # ******************************************************************************* |
| 3 | + # Copyright (c) 2026 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation |
| 4 | + # |
| 5 | + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional |
| 6 | + # information regarding copyright ownership. |
| 7 | + # |
| 8 | + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the |
| 9 | + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at |
| 10 | + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| 11 | + # |
| 12 | + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 |
| 13 | + # ******************************************************************************* |
| 14 | +
|
| 15 | +:hide-toc: |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +.. _v1_0_planning_approach: |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +Planning Approach |
| 20 | +================= |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +.. note:: |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | + This page is **a short summary** of how the S-CORE v1.0 roadmap is |
| 25 | + planned. The authoritative planning procedure — covering project |
| 26 | + management, release management, change management and the underlying |
| 27 | + governance — is described in the |
| 28 | + `Platform Management Plan |
| 29 | + <https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/index.html>`__ |
| 30 | + (in particular |
| 31 | + `Project Management |
| 32 | + <https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/project_management.html>`__ |
| 33 | + and |
| 34 | + `Release Management |
| 35 | + <https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/release_management.html>`__). |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +Where we plan |
| 38 | +------------- |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +All v1.0 planning is tracked in the central GitHub project |
| 41 | +`S-CORE v1.0 Planning <https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/projects/17/views/37>`__. |
| 42 | +This project is the single source of truth for the roadmap; the figures and |
| 43 | +tables shown elsewhere in this section are derived from it. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +Product Increments per Feature Team / Community |
| 46 | +----------------------------------------------- |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +Every Feature Team and every Community creates **one ticket of type |
| 49 | +"Product Increment"** for each release gate they contribute to. This ticket: |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +- is the **main ticket** for the team's work in that release gate, |
| 52 | +- is **mapped to the corresponding milestone** (using the ticket's |
| 53 | + *milestone* attribute) in the |
| 54 | + `eclipse-score/score milestones |
| 55 | + <https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/milestones>`__ (e.g. ``v0.8``, |
| 56 | + ``v0.9``, ``v0.10``, ``v1.0``), and |
| 57 | +- represents the team's commitment for that release gate. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +Sub-tickets — the actual work |
| 60 | +----------------------------- |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +All work the team performs for the corresponding milestone / release gate is |
| 63 | +**linked as sub-tickets under the Product Increment ticket**. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +- The breakdown does **not need to be exhaustive**; it can be detailed if a |
| 66 | + team wants to, but at a minimum it should reflect the **main achievements |
| 67 | + or work packages** planned for that release gate. |
| 68 | +- The sub-ticket structure ensures that the Product Increment ticket gives a |
| 69 | + meaningful overview of the team's scope without having to dig through every |
| 70 | + individual issue. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +Process-area attribute |
| 73 | +---------------------- |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +Wherever possible, each sub-ticket sets the **process area** GitHub project's |
| 76 | +attribute, for |
| 77 | +example ``pa1_req_eng``, ``pa2_arch_design``, ``pa3_implementation``, |
| 78 | +``pa4_verification``. This makes it possible to group and filter tickets not |
| 79 | +only **by time** (milestone / release gate) but also **by function** |
| 80 | +(process area), which is what feeds the per-process-area views on the |
| 81 | +:doc:`Overall Status <overall_status>` page. |
0 commit comments