Skip to content

Commit daede64

Browse files
committed
Meeting notes for Planning Council 2026-03-04
1 parent 0277611 commit daede64

File tree

2 files changed

+56
-0
lines changed

2 files changed

+56
-0
lines changed

wiki/Planning_Council.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ Telephone Dial in (for higher quality, dial a number based on your curr
6363

6464
### Meeting Minutes
6565

66+
- [2026-03-04](Planning_Council/2026-03-04.md)
6667
- [2026-02-04](Planning_Council/2026-02-04.md)
6768
- [2026-01-07](Planning_Council/2026-01-07.md)
6869
- [2025-12-03](Planning_Council/2025-12-03.md)
Lines changed: 55 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
1+
# 2026-03-04 Meeting Notes
2+
3+
## Agenda
4+
5+
- Status 2026-03
6+
- Java 25 in SimRel for 2026-06
7+
- Top Priorities Board
8+
9+
10+
## Minutes
11+
12+
### Status 2026-03
13+
- Ed fixed issues when running with Java 26
14+
- Except for that, the release looks good
15+
16+
### Java 25 for 2026-06
17+
- Still no Java 25 Temurin build for Windows AArch64 available (https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium-support/issues/1402)
18+
- We have a high number of downloads of EPP products for Windows AArch64 (https://github.com/merks/test/issues/1)
19+
- In the past, there were different EPP releases for different Java versions, but it was high effort to maintain
20+
- Conclusion:
21+
- We don't allow BREE bump to Java 25 for 2026-06 by SimRel participants
22+
- For the 2026-09 release, we will probably need to allow a bump to Java 25 no matter if currently missing Temurin builds are still unavailable
23+
24+
### Top Priorities Board
25+
- [Dev Efforts Top Priorities Board](https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse-wg/ide-wg/ide-wg-dev-funded-efforts/ide-wg-dev-funded-program-planning-council-top-issues/-/boards/1208)
26+
- Currently no funding for those tasks available, but valuable to have a representation of topics that we agree to consider most relevant to address (not matter how/who)
27+
- Proposal: have 2-3 topics of high(est) priority to reflect the most pressing issues
28+
- Issue for Linux support already existing due to necessity for GTK4 adoption
29+
- Issue for Win32 platform support already existing, particularly for keeping SWT compatible with new Windows versions
30+
- Specific Risks in MacOS platform support: SWT uses old APIs for embedding browser, which might be removed at any point in time (unclear if there would be a heads-up in advance)
31+
- Idea to have support for every platform represented in a dedicated issue (keeping platform compatibility is an ongoing issue); don't put multiple platforms into a single issue as people focussed on one platform may think it is not important for them
32+
- Security vulnerabilities are an ongoing high priority issue
33+
- Existing issues
34+
- HiDPI: currently not of higher relevance/severity than any other area of issues
35+
- JDT reviews
36+
- No additional capacities available but also less contributions, so not worth to have an issue for it
37+
- Task for reviewing JDT compiler issues is hardly staffable, as the person would need to be deep into the project
38+
- Proposals for new issues
39+
- Icon packs
40+
- Make aware of ongoing efforts towards icon packs and the improved look & feel coming from the ability to exchange icons
41+
- Mixture of "old" and "new" icons may not be as bad as one would expect without having seen it
42+
- Technical tricks may allow to adapt "old" icons to a new icon pack
43+
- Babel project
44+
- Not maintained for years and will affect all consumers of localized products
45+
46+
47+
## Action Items
48+
49+
- Check and Update [Dev Efforts Top Priorities](https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse-wg/ide-wg/ide-wg-dev-funded-efforts/ide-wg-dev-funded-program-planning-council-top-issues/-/boards/1208)
50+
- Ask SimRel participants to stay at Java 21 or below for 2026-06 (Heiko)
51+
52+
53+
## Next Meeting
54+
55+
Next meeting will be on April 1th, 2026.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)