|
| 1 | +# 2026-03-04 Meeting Notes |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Agenda |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +- Status 2026-03 |
| 6 | +- Java 25 in SimRel for 2026-06 |
| 7 | +- Top Priorities Board |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## Minutes |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +### Status 2026-03 |
| 13 | +- Ed fixed issues when running with Java 26 |
| 14 | +- Except for that, the release looks good |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +### Java 25 for 2026-06 |
| 17 | +- Still no Java 25 Temurin build for Windows AArch64 available (https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium-support/issues/1402) |
| 18 | +- We have a high number of downloads of EPP products for Windows AArch64 (https://github.com/merks/test/issues/1) |
| 19 | +- In the past, there were different EPP releases for different Java versions, but it was high effort to maintain |
| 20 | +- Conclusion: |
| 21 | + - We don't allow BREE bump to Java 25 for 2026-06 by SimRel participants |
| 22 | + - For the 2026-09 release, we will probably need to allow a bump to Java 25 no matter if currently missing Temurin builds are still unavailable |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### Top Priorities Board |
| 25 | +- [Dev Efforts Top Priorities Board](https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse-wg/ide-wg/ide-wg-dev-funded-efforts/ide-wg-dev-funded-program-planning-council-top-issues/-/boards/1208) |
| 26 | +- Currently no funding for those tasks available, but valuable to have a representation of topics that we agree to consider most relevant to address (not matter how/who) |
| 27 | +- Proposal: have 2-3 topics of high(est) priority to reflect the most pressing issues |
| 28 | + - Issue for Linux support already existing due to necessity for GTK4 adoption |
| 29 | + - Issue for Win32 platform support already existing, particularly for keeping SWT compatible with new Windows versions |
| 30 | + - Specific Risks in MacOS platform support: SWT uses old APIs for embedding browser, which might be removed at any point in time (unclear if there would be a heads-up in advance) |
| 31 | + - Idea to have support for every platform represented in a dedicated issue (keeping platform compatibility is an ongoing issue); don't put multiple platforms into a single issue as people focussed on one platform may think it is not important for them |
| 32 | + - Security vulnerabilities are an ongoing high priority issue |
| 33 | +- Existing issues |
| 34 | + - HiDPI: currently not of higher relevance/severity than any other area of issues |
| 35 | + - JDT reviews |
| 36 | + - No additional capacities available but also less contributions, so not worth to have an issue for it |
| 37 | + - Task for reviewing JDT compiler issues is hardly staffable, as the person would need to be deep into the project |
| 38 | +- Proposals for new issues |
| 39 | + - Icon packs |
| 40 | + - Make aware of ongoing efforts towards icon packs and the improved look & feel coming from the ability to exchange icons |
| 41 | + - Mixture of "old" and "new" icons may not be as bad as one would expect without having seen it |
| 42 | + - Technical tricks may allow to adapt "old" icons to a new icon pack |
| 43 | + - Babel project |
| 44 | + - Not maintained for years and will affect all consumers of localized products |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## Action Items |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +- Check and Update [Dev Efforts Top Priorities](https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse-wg/ide-wg/ide-wg-dev-funded-efforts/ide-wg-dev-funded-program-planning-council-top-issues/-/boards/1208) |
| 50 | +- Ask SimRel participants to stay at Java 21 or below for 2026-06 (Heiko) |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +## Next Meeting |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +Next meeting will be on April 1th, 2026. |
0 commit comments