Add syntax highlighting for byte literals#190
Merged
Conversation
jiribenes
reviewed
Apr 10, 2026
jiribenes
left a comment
jiribenes
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks!
I'm happy to accept this if I get a nice screenshot from VSCode showing that it does, in fact, work :)
jiribenes
changed the title
Contributor
Author
Here you go! |
jiribenes
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added syntax highlighting for valid byte literals as well for invalid byte literals like 0xFFF or 0xZZ as mentioned in #179