Skip to content

[New Rule] AWS Bedrock API Key Used for Destructive or Anti-Recovery Action#6386

Open
bryans3c wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
rule/aws-bedrock-api-key-destructive-action
Open

[New Rule] AWS Bedrock API Key Used for Destructive or Anti-Recovery Action#6386
bryans3c wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
rule/aws-bedrock-api-key-destructive-action

Conversation

@bryans3c

@bryans3c bryans3c commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request

Issue link(s):

Summary - What I changed

Detects an Amazon Bedrock API key (bearer token) used for a destructive or anti-recovery control-plane action, deleting a guardrail, custom/imported model, or provisioned throughput, or disabling model invocation logging.

Bedrock API keys are bearer tokens meant for model invocation (InvokeModel/Converse); every such call is identifiable in CloudTrail by additionalEventData.callWithBearerToken = true. Using one to delete Bedrock resources or disable logging is inconsistent with the credential's purpose and is characteristic of LLMjacking.

image

How To Test

Query can be used in TRADE stack and other telemetry stacks.

Checklist

  • Added a label for the type of pr: bug, enhancement, schema, maintenance, Rule: New, Rule: Deprecation, Rule: Tuning, Hunt: New, or Hunt: Tuning so guidelines can be generated
  • Added the meta:rapid-merge label if planning to merge within 24 hours
  • Secret and sensitive material has been managed correctly
  • Automated testing was updated or added to match the most common scenarios
  • Documentation and comments were added for features that require explanation

Contributor checklist

@bryans3c bryans3c self-assigned this Jul 6, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 6, 2026 10:29
@bryans3c bryans3c added Integration: AWS AWS related rules Rule: New Proposal for new rule Domain: Cloud labels Jul 6, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new AWS CloudTrail ES|QL detection rule aimed at identifying Amazon Bedrock API keys (bearer tokens) being used for destructive or anti-recovery Bedrock control-plane actions, which is inconsistent with their intended purpose (model invocation) and aligns with LLMjacking/sabotage behaviors.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new production Bedrock rule that matches destructive Bedrock API actions when callWithBearerToken is present in CloudTrail additional_eventdata.
  • Includes investigation guidance, false positive notes, references, and ATT&CK mappings for Defense Evasion and Impact.

Comment on lines +63 to +72
tags = [
"Domain: Cloud",
"Data Source: AWS",
"Data Source: Amazon Web Services",
"Data Source: Amazon Bedrock",
"Use Case: Threat Detection",
"Tactic: Impact",
"Tactic: Defense Evasion",
"Resources: Investigation Guide",
]
Comment thread rules/integrations/aws/impact_bedrock_api_key_destructive_action.toml Outdated
query = '''
FROM logs-aws.cloudtrail-* METADATA _id, _version, _index
| WHERE event.provider == "bedrock.amazonaws.com"
AND aws.cloudtrail.additional_eventdata RLIKE """.*callWithBearerToken=true.*"""
bryans3c and others added 2 commits July 6, 2026 12:48
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants