Commit 13aa6fc
Warn when an encrypted search runs before the index has finished building (#34001)
* Warn when an encrypted search runs before the index has finished building
When a search runs in an encrypted room while the local Seshat index is still
crawling not-yet-indexed history, results can silently come back partial.
SearchWarning now subscribes to the event index's changedCheckpoint progress and
shows a polite (role=status) notice while the crawl is in progress, clearing
automatically the moment indexing finishes.
* Scope the partial-index warning to the room being searched
The warning was driven by `currentRoom() !== null`, which is a global signal:
it is non-null while the crawler has any outstanding checkpoint for any room.
Searching a fully-crawled room while an unrelated room was still being crawled
therefore claimed the results may be incomplete when they were not.
Drive it from `crawlingRooms()` instead, which reports the rooms with
outstanding checkpoints by id, and pass the search scope and room id in from
RoomSearchAuxPanel: a room-scoped search now asks only about that room, while
an all-rooms search still reacts to any outstanding checkpoint. Using room ids
throughout also avoids `currentRoom()` returning null, and so under-reporting a
crawl, when the js-sdk does not know the room at the head of the queue.
The `changedCheckpoint` payload only carries the globally-current room and
cannot answer a per-room question, so the handler re-reads the checkpoint set.
* Also warn when the searched room has not been indexed at all
The crawl set cannot see a room that has no checkpoint: before the initial
checkpoints have been seeded, such a room is absent from it and looks identical
to one that has been fully crawled. That is the case issue #32253 describes, so
ask isRoomIndexed() as well, and warn when the index holds no events for the
room being searched.
Only ask it while the crawler still has work outstanding. That is what the
warning claims, and the index has no event for its contents changing --
changedCheckpoint fires on checkpoint transitions only, and an idle crawler is
silent -- so a warning raised once the crawler had drained would never be
re-evaluated and would stick.
Rename the hook to useIsIndexIncomplete, as it no longer answers the narrower
question of whether a crawl is in progress. Re-seed it from the checkpoint set
on each scope or room change so that the previous search's answer is not left
on screen while the lookup is in flight, but not on each checkpoint change,
which would blink an already-earned warning off and on again.
Also reword the crawlingRooms() doc, which described the set as the rooms being
crawled when it holds every queued checkpoint too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>1 parent d0a70fb commit 13aa6fc
5 files changed
Lines changed: 489 additions & 7 deletions
File tree
- apps/web
- src
- components/views
- elements
- rooms
- i18n/strings
- indexing
- test/unit-tests/components/views/elements
Lines changed: 125 additions & 3 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
6 | 6 | | |
7 | 7 | | |
8 | 8 | | |
9 | | - | |
| 9 | + | |
10 | 10 | | |
11 | 11 | | |
12 | 12 | | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
13 | 15 | | |
14 | 16 | | |
15 | 17 | | |
| |||
26 | 28 | | |
27 | 29 | | |
28 | 30 | | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
29 | 35 | | |
30 | 36 | | |
31 | | - | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
| 51 | + | |
| 52 | + | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
| 55 | + | |
| 56 | + | |
| 57 | + | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
| 60 | + | |
| 61 | + | |
| 62 | + | |
| 63 | + | |
| 64 | + | |
| 65 | + | |
| 66 | + | |
| 67 | + | |
| 68 | + | |
| 69 | + | |
| 70 | + | |
| 71 | + | |
| 72 | + | |
| 73 | + | |
| 74 | + | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
| 104 | + | |
| 105 | + | |
| 106 | + | |
| 107 | + | |
| 108 | + | |
| 109 | + | |
| 110 | + | |
| 111 | + | |
| 112 | + | |
| 113 | + | |
| 114 | + | |
| 115 | + | |
| 116 | + | |
| 117 | + | |
| 118 | + | |
| 119 | + | |
| 120 | + | |
| 121 | + | |
| 122 | + | |
| 123 | + | |
| 124 | + | |
| 125 | + | |
| 126 | + | |
| 127 | + | |
| 128 | + | |
| 129 | + | |
| 130 | + | |
| 131 | + | |
| 132 | + | |
| 133 | + | |
| 134 | + | |
| 135 | + | |
| 136 | + | |
| 137 | + | |
| 138 | + | |
| 139 | + | |
32 | 140 | | |
33 | | - | |
| 141 | + | |
| 142 | + | |
| 143 | + | |
| 144 | + | |
| 145 | + | |
| 146 | + | |
| 147 | + | |
| 148 | + | |
| 149 | + | |
| 150 | + | |
| 151 | + | |
| 152 | + | |
| 153 | + | |
| 154 | + | |
| 155 | + | |
34 | 156 | | |
35 | 157 | | |
36 | 158 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
45 | 45 | | |
46 | 46 | | |
47 | 47 | | |
48 | | - | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
| 51 | + | |
| 52 | + | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
49 | 55 | | |
50 | 56 | | |
51 | 57 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
2434 | 2434 | | |
2435 | 2435 | | |
2436 | 2436 | | |
2437 | | - | |
| 2437 | + | |
| 2438 | + | |
2438 | 2439 | | |
2439 | 2440 | | |
2440 | 2441 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
992 | 992 | | |
993 | 993 | | |
994 | 994 | | |
995 | | - | |
| 995 | + | |
| 996 | + | |
| 997 | + | |
| 998 | + | |
996 | 999 | | |
997 | 1000 | | |
998 | 1001 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments