You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: guides/https.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ So far this document has focused on configuring Plug to handle TLS within the ap
236
236
237
237
### Pros and Cons
238
238
239
-
Offloading might be done to achieve higher throughput, or to stick to the more widely used OpenSSL implementation of the TLS protocol. The Erlang/OTP implementation depends on OpenSSL for the underlying cryptography, but it implements its own message framing and protocol state machine. While it is not clear that one implementation is inherently more secure than the other, just patching OpenSSL along with everybody else in case of vulnerabilities might give peace of mind, compared to than having to research the implications on the Erlang/OTP implementation.
239
+
Offloading might be done to achieve higher throughput, or to stick to the more widely used OpenSSL implementation of the TLS protocol. The Erlang/OTP implementation depends on OpenSSL for the underlying cryptography, but it implements its own message framing and protocol state machine. While it is not clear that one implementation is inherently more secure than the other, just patching OpenSSL along with everybody else in case of vulnerabilities might give peace of mind, compared to having to research the implications on the Erlang/OTP implementation.
240
240
241
241
On the other hand, the proxy solution might not support end-to-end HTTP 2, limiting the benefits of the new protocol. It can also introduce operational complexities and new resource constraints, especially for long-lived connections such as WebSockets.
0 commit comments