Add AgentsKit#1722
Open
EmersonBraun wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello, and thanks for maintaining this list.
I would like to suggest adding AgentsKit to the React > React Libraries section. It is an open source toolkit for building AI agents in JavaScript, covering a small core, UI bindings for React, Vue, Svelte and Angular, an agent runtime, tools, memory and RAG.
To be upfront: I am the author. This is a solo project that I have been building and maintaining on my own. I am not submitting it for promotion. My main goal is to reach other developers who might find it useful, and hopefully find people interested in contributing. It is MIT licensed, with tests, documentation and contribution guidelines at https://www.agentskit.io.
I tried to follow the contributing guidelines: a single entry, the format used by the surrounding entries, and the category that seemed most relevant. If the wording, placement or category is off, let me know and I will fix it, or I am happy to close this if it is not a good fit for the list.
Thanks for taking a look.