Review tutorials early#230
Conversation
Thank you!Thank you for your pull request 😃 🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}. If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:
Rendered Changes🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/epiverse-trace/tutorials-early/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-230 The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents: What does this mean?If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible. This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation. ⏱️ Updated at 2026-04-20 13:51:51 +0000 |
This PR makes several edits to the Clean case data (
episodes/clean-data.Rmd), Validate case data (episodes/validate.Rmd) and Aggregate and visualize (episodes/describe-cases.Rmd) episodes.This PR is part of the review of Epiverse tutorials for the upcoming Outbreak Analytics and Applied Modelling in R short course (Week 1).
Please feel free to revert any changes in this PR that you disagree with.
Edits to the 3 tutorials included in Week 1 of the Outbreak Analytics and Applied Modelling in R short course. Changes include some fixes to spelling and grammar, improved consistency and clarity. There were a few bug fixes/typos in the code chunks.
What is the issue you are addressing?
If contributing new additional material please explain why you think it is needed
Any new text in the 3 tutorials reviewed is aimed at improving the clarity of the content being read by the learners.