You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 7, 2026. It is now read-only.
Run the **complete SSZ validation pipeline** in your browser with zero installation:
298
+
299
+
[](https://colab.research.google.com/github/error-wtf/Segmented-Spacetime-Mass-Projection-Unified-Results/blob/main/SSZ_Colab_Complete.ipynb)
300
+
301
+
### What You Get
302
+
303
+
| Feature | Description |
304
+
|---------|-------------|
305
+
|**Git LFS Setup**| Automatic installation for large files |
306
+
|**Repository Clone**| Full codebase + 427 observations (~100 MB) |
307
+
|**Dependencies**| All Python packages auto-installed |
308
+
|**Cache Clearing**| Fresh bytecode for 100% pass rate |
309
+
|**23 Test Suites**| Complete physics validation |
We initially attempted to run the SSZ pipeline directly on the provided GAIA (and GAIA+SDSS) catalogues. However, the released tables did not match the assumptions of our analysis:
536
+
537
+
-**Missing columns:** Several columns required by the pipeline were completely missing
538
+
-**Different semantics:** Some fields had different semantics than documented
539
+
-**Scale inconsistencies:** Key quantities (e.g. magnitudes and distances) were off by orders of magnitude compared to our internal consistency checks
540
+
541
+
Because of this, any attempt to "fill in" the missing columns or rescale the data would have turned the test into a meaningless exercise. We decided instead to:
542
+
543
+
1.**Keep the GAIA/SDSS pipeline code** in the repository for transparency
544
+
2.**Mark the corresponding test as skipped** in the automated suite
545
+
3.**Explicitly document** that the real GAIA/SDSS tables in their current form are not suitable for a fair SSZ vs. GR comparison
446
546
447
-
### GAIA/SDSS Data Note
547
+
The single skipped test in the full test run therefore reflects this design decision: it documents that we did try to interface with the real GAIA data, but rejected ad-hoc fixes once it became clear that the catalogues do not match the required structure or physical scales.
448
548
449
-
We attempted to run SSZ on GAIA/SDSS catalogs but found:
450
-
-Missing required columns
451
-
-Different semantics than documented
452
-
-Magnitude/distance inconsistencies
549
+
**Important:** This does NOT affect our validation results. The 99.1% combined validation is based on:
550
+
-**ESO Archive data** (47 professional spectroscopy observations) - ✅ Complete and validated
551
+
-**Energy Framework** (129 astronomical objects) - ✅ Complete and validated
552
+
-**Multi-ring datasets** (G79, Cygnus X) - ✅ Complete and validated
453
553
454
-
The pipeline code is preserved but tests are skipped. See [full explanation](FAQ.md#data--results).
0 commit comments