License clarification

[vvuk]

I came across this project randomly and it looks fantastic! I'm thinking about implementing a SWD-based sampling profiler, and this codebase seems like a great place to start. I wanted to get a clarification on the license of the code -- I see the MIT license at the top level, but a few of the files (e.g.

pico_debug/modules/lerp_task/task.c

Lines 1 to 11 in 7ca57da

	/* ========================================
	*
	* Copyright YOUR COMPANY, THE YEAR
	* All Rights Reserved
	* UNPUBLISHED, LICENSED SOFTWARE.
	*
	* CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
	* WHICH IS THE PROPERTY OF your company.
	*
	* ========================================
	*/

) have what I hope is just leftover stub license. To confirm -- the entire repo is MIT licensed? (I plan on doing my work under MIT as well, but wanted to make sure there were no issues!)

[essele]

Hi,Yes you are correct, the whole thing is meant to be unencumbered and hence the MIT license.When i get a chance I’ll fix anything left around.Cheers,Lee.On 3 Jun 2024, at 15:54, Vladimir Vukicevic ***@***.***> wrote: I came across this project randomly and it looks fantastic! I'm thinking about implementing a SWD-based sampling profiler, and this codebase seems like a great place to start. I wanted to get a clarification on the license of the code -- I see the MIT license at the top level, but a few of the files (e.g. https://github.com/essele/pico_debug/blob/7ca57da198614f3ce952db187457681a2c89fcbf/modules/lerp_task/task.c#L1-L11 ) have what I hope is just leftover stub license. To confirm -- the entire repo is MIT licensed? (I plan on doing my work under MIT as well, but wanted to make sure there were no issues!) —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>