fix: accept day suffix in validityDuration as documented

[xrl]

Setting validityDuration to the documented day format (e.g. 365d, used by both TLS samples in config/samples) makes reconciliation fail permanently with failed to parse ValidityDuration: time: unknown unit "d" in duration "365d", because parseValidityDuration delegates directly to time.ParseDuration, which does not support the d unit the API doc promises (100d12h). This change expands a leading day segment to hours before parsing, leaving plain Go durations and the empty-string default untouched. Adds table-driven tests for parseValidityDuration covering day-suffix, mixed, plain, default, and invalid inputs.

---

PR series — operability fixes & TLS

Small single-purpose PRs from live kind-cluster testing of the operator. Each stands alone unless an After is listed. → = this PR.

	PR	Lands	After
	Reviewable now — small, any order
🟢	#374	Requeue instead of swallowing the client-cert provisioning error	—
🟢	#391	Grant events.k8s.io RBAC so operator Events are actually recorded	—
🟢	#392	Correlate members[]/leaderID from one health snapshot (consistent leader)	—
🟢	#393	Propagate user-supplied altNames.ipAddresses into certificates	—
🟢→	#394	Accept day-suffix validityDuration (365d, 100d12h) as documented	—
🟢	#395	Surface early reconcile errors as a Degraded condition (was empty status)	—
🟢	#379	Configurable reconcile worker pool (--max-concurrent-reconciles)	—
🟢	#369	kind-based stress/scale e2e harness (1/3/7 members, churn, quorum watcher)	—
	TLS stack — in order
🟢	#376	Independent spec.tls.{peer,client} surfaces (breaking alpha API)	—
⚪	#377	TLSReady condition + TLS lifecycle Events	#376
⚪	#378	Multi-member TLS quorum e2e + PeerCANotShared	#377
	Parked as drafts pending #363
⚪	#382	Per-cluster domain metrics on the operator /metrics endpoint	—
⚪	#384	EtcdCluster admission webhooks (consolidating with #328)	#363
⚪	#386	EtcdBackup CR → object storage (S3/GCS)	#363
⚪	#387	Automatic quorum-loss disaster recovery (bootstrap-latch guarded)	#363

🟢 ready · ⚪ draft

[kubernetes-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xrl
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign hakman for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[kubernetes-prow]

Hi @xrl. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.