Skip to content

feat: add support for stateful fixture format#182

Closed
fselmo wants to merge 1 commit into
ethpandaops:masterfrom
fselmo:fill-stateful-tests
Closed

feat: add support for stateful fixture format#182
fselmo wants to merge 1 commit into
ethpandaops:masterfrom
fselmo:fill-stateful-tests

Conversation

@fselmo

@fselmo fselmo commented Apr 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

These changes go together with the execution-specs PR here.

I will leave this as a draft until the design / approach is settled there as some of this flow may change. [this is aligned with the current state in execution-specs now].

The main goal here is to be able to read the pre-run file, apply these things before setting the checkpoint, and then be able to read the new stateful fixture format and run these tests with benchmarkoor.

The current state of this flow has been tested and is working but some of these interactions may change, as mentioned above.

cc: @LouisTsai-Csie

@skylenet skylenet mentioned this pull request May 12, 2026
3 tasks
skylenet added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2026
## Summary
Cherry-picked from the second commit of #182 (`4439298`, by @fselmo).
Adds a `git-repo` input to the composite action so CI workflows
triggered by PRs from forks clone the fork's HEAD instead of always
cloning `ethpandaops/benchmarkoor`. The workflow wires
`github.event.pull_request.head.repo.clone_url` into that input and uses
`head.repo.full_name` in the `run-config-urls` so the runtime config
files are also fetched from the fork.

## Test plan
- [ ] Open a PR from a fork against this branch and confirm the CI
action clones the fork (the workflow log should show `Cloning
https://github.com/<fork-owner>/benchmarkoor.git at ref <sha>`).
- [ ] Verify the `run-config-urls` resolve to
`raw.githubusercontent.com/<fork-owner>/benchmarkoor/<sha>/...` rather
than the canonical repo path.
- [ ] PRs from branches inside `ethpandaops/benchmarkoor` should
continue to clone the canonical repo unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Felipe Selmo <fselmo2@gmail.com>
@fselmo fselmo force-pushed the fill-stateful-tests branch from 4439298 to f32f5a5 Compare May 19, 2026 17:23
@fselmo fselmo marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2026 17:45
@marioevz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note to self: This commit ethereum/execution-specs@fbc39ad could have broken this PR, need to double check.

@fselmo

fselmo commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Note to self: This commit ethereum/execution-specs@fbc39ad could have broken this PR, need to double check.

Just checked and this doesn't seem to have broken anything 👀

@skylenet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

closing this in favour of #248 which is progressing nicely and already supports state-actor + fill-stateful from the execution-specs.

@skylenet skylenet closed this Jun 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants