You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Convert the repo's latent product contract into a repeatable benchmark suite with explicit pass/fail evidence.
This issue was generated from an org-wide EvalOps mining pass on 2026-05-10 07:57 UTC. It combines live GitHub repo signals with a per-repo arXiv search. Treat the research links as grounding for a concrete implementation, not as a request for a literature review.
Repo Evidence
Repository description: A small MCP (Model Context Protocol) firewall that proxies JSON-RPC and enforces allow/deny policies for tools, resources, prompts, and methods
Tree signals: 0 docs files, 0 workflows, 0 proto files, 0 test-like files.
README.md:71 includes latent-spec language: - --mode observe is shorthand for --dry-run. - --mode contain enables --no-network automatically, but you should still set --allow-bin to constrain subprocesses.
README.md:178 includes latent-spec language: methods: # Only restrict these if needed; leaving allow empty keeps defaults permissive. deny: []
README.md:257 includes latent-spec language: MCP stdio uses line-delimited JSON in the current spec. This proxy defaults to --server-framing line, but you can switch to LSP-style framing with --server-framing lsp if needed.
arXiv:2506.11019v1 Mind the Metrics: Patterns for Telemetry-Aware In-IDE AI Application Development using the Model Context Protocol (MCP) (Vincent Koc, Jacques Verre, Douglas Blank, Abigail Morgan), 2025.
arXiv:2506.02032v2 Towards Secure MLOps: Surveying Attacks, Mitigation Strategies, and Research Challenges (Raj Patel, Himanshu Tripathi, Jasper Stone, Noorbakhsh Amiri Golilarz, Sudip Mittal, Shahram Rahimi), 2025.
arXiv:2307.13473v1 Exploring MLOps Dynamics: An Experimental Analysis in a Real-World Machine Learning Project (Awadelrahman M. A. Ahmed), 2023.
arXiv:2604.24801v2 Architectural Observability Collapse in Transformers (Thomas Carmichael), 2026.
arXiv:2501.13723v1 Intelligent Exercise and Feedback System for Social Healthcare using LLMOps (Yeongrak Choi, Taeyoung Kim, Hyung Soo Han), 2025.
arXiv:2512.11541v1 A Multi-Criteria Automated MLOps Pipeline for Cost-Effective Cloud-Based Classifier Retraining in Response to Data Distribution Shifts (Emmanuel K. Katalay, David O. Dimandja, Jordan F. Masakuna), 2025.
arXiv:2302.01061v1 MLOps with enhanced performance control and observability (Indradumna Banerjee, Dinesh Ghanta, Girish Nautiyal, Pradeep Sanchana, Prateek Katageri, Atin Modi), 2023.
arXiv:2601.20415v1 An Empirical Evaluation of Modern MLOps Frameworks (Jon Marcos-Mercadé, Unai Lopez-Novoa, Mikel Egaña Aranguren), 2026.
arXiv:2602.18764v2 The Convergence of Schema-Guided Dialogue Systems and the Model Context Protocol (Andreas Schlapbach), 2026.
What To Build
Define the smallest representative mcp-firewall golden workflow and capture expected inputs, outputs, and evidence artifacts.
Add fixtures for a successful path, an ambiguous/degraded path, and a failure path.
Publish a command that local agents and CI can run before shipping related changes.
Acceptance Criteria
A short design note names the repo-specific workflow, threat or correctness model, and the research assumptions being adopted.
A runnable check, fixture, or verifier exercises the new contract in CI or an equivalent local command documented in the repo.
The implementation emits or stores enough evidence for a downstream agent/operator to cite inputs, decisions, and outputs.
At least one negative/degraded-mode case is covered so failures are observable rather than silently accepted.
Documentation links the new behavior to the relevant EvalOps platform primitive or explicitly records why this repo remains standalone.
Notes
Generated issue 1/5 for evalops/mcp-firewall by evalops_org_miner.py.
Before implementation, confirm the sampled latent-spec snippets still match main; this issue intentionally cites exact file paths/lines where the mining pass saw them.
Summary
Convert the repo's latent product contract into a repeatable benchmark suite with explicit pass/fail evidence.
This issue was generated from an org-wide EvalOps mining pass on 2026-05-10 07:57 UTC. It combines live GitHub repo signals with a per-repo arXiv search. Treat the research links as grounding for a concrete implementation, not as a request for a literature review.
Repo Evidence
README.md:71includes latent-spec language: ---mode observeis shorthand for--dry-run. ---mode containenables--no-networkautomatically, but you should still set--allow-binto constrain subprocesses.README.md:178includes latent-spec language: methods: # Only restrict these if needed; leaving allow empty keeps defaults permissive. deny: []README.md:257includes latent-spec language: MCP stdio uses line-delimited JSON in the current spec. This proxy defaults to--server-framing line, but you can switch to LSP-style framing with--server-framing lspif needed.Research Grounding
Repo axes: infra, governance, security, evaluation
Search keywords: policy, mcp-firewall, yaml, allow, http, pattern, deny, example, mcp, string, matchdetail, return
What To Build
mcp-firewallgolden workflow and capture expected inputs, outputs, and evidence artifacts.Acceptance Criteria
Notes
evalops/mcp-firewallbyevalops_org_miner.py.main; this issue intentionally cites exact file paths/lines where the mining pass saw them.