⬆️ Update ruff from 0.2.0 to 0.4.1 and fix deprecated scripts…#902
Closed
ryankwondev wants to merge 2 commits intofastapi:mainfrom
Closed
⬆️ Update ruff from 0.2.0 to 0.4.1 and fix deprecated scripts…#902ryankwondev wants to merge 2 commits intofastapi:mainfrom
ryankwondev wants to merge 2 commits intofastapi:mainfrom
Conversation
Author
|
(+) I think the cause of the pre-commit process, |
Contributor
|
📝 Docs preview for commit ceb442e at: https://188583b9.sqlmodel.pages.dev |
Member
|
Thanks! This was covered in another PR, so I'll close this one now. ☕ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⬆️ Update ruff from 0.2.0 to 0.4.1 and fix deprecated scripts commands
pyproject.tomlto "ruff = "0.4.1"".ruff [dir]format has been deprecated (warning: ruff is deprecated. Use ruff check instead.).format.shandlint.shscript.🚨 DEAR MAINTAINERS,
As a result of the impact of bullet point no. 4, the format of the
...return type has been uniformly changed. If this change is undesirable, it seems that additional formatting rules need to be added.before:
after: