Skip to content

Thoughts on adding more maintainers? #887

@tomquas

Description

@tomquas

@demochenkoalex — First off, a huge thank you for this package. Seriously, it gave us such a great head start on our chat module, and we're really grateful for that.

That said, I won't lie — it makes me a bit sad to see things have slowed down here. The last real feature work was back in mid-2023, and there are some genuinely useful PRs from @nicosbraun that have been sitting there for over six months now.

I know we can't see what's going on behind someone's GitHub avatar — life happens, and open source is a labor of love. But I wanted to ask: would you be open to adding a few more maintainers to help carry the load?
Honestly, I really don't want to fork this project. It feels wrong — like it would brush aside all the work you've put in. But we're getting to a point where we need to figure out what's next for us. We'd much rather see this package keep going with you at the helm, maybe with some extra hands to help out.

What do you think?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions