Skip to content

chore: bump version to 0.62.0#32

Merged
fmguerreiro merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/bump-0.62.0
Apr 26, 2026
Merged

chore: bump version to 0.62.0#32
fmguerreiro merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/bump-0.62.0

Conversation

@fmguerreiro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Minor version bump 0.61.1 → 0.62.0. Per the README convention, any change to the typed AST is technically breaking and warrants a 0.(N+1) bump.

Bundled fork-side work since 0.61.0:

Files

  • Cargo.toml — version 0.61.10.62.0
  • changelog/0.62.0.md — new fork-only changelog entry

Cargo.lock is gitignored on this fork (per the upstream library convention) so no lockfile update is part of this PR.

Test plan

  • CI: build + test + clippy + fmt all green on the standard matrix.
  • After merge: cargo publish from the maintainer's workstation.

Minor bump per the fork convention that any AST change warrants 0.(N+1).
Includes the breaking rename of Statement::Comment.relation -> table_name
(#31) plus #28 and #30 as fork-side work since the 0.61.0 release.
@fmguerreiro fmguerreiro merged commit f3200a2 into main Apr 26, 2026
19 checks passed
@fmguerreiro fmguerreiro deleted the chore/bump-0.62.0 branch April 26, 2026 06:09
fmguerreiro added a commit to fmguerreiro/pgmold that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2026
…#272)

The 0.62.0 release (fmguerreiro/datafusion-sqlparser-rs#32) renames
Statement::Comment.relation to table_name for consistency with sibling
AST nodes (AlterPolicy.table_name, CreatePolicy.table_name,
DropPolicy.table_name, AlterTrigger.table_name).

pgmold-293's audit had concluded the bump was Cargo.toml-only because
pgmold matched Statement::Comment { .. } without field-name destructure.
That audit was stale: pgmold-273 (e860e3d) had since added a destructure
that bound `relation`. This commit therefore also:

- renames pgmold's internal CommentStatement.relation -> table_name to
  mirror the upstream AST.
- aliases the field at the destructure site to `partner_table` so the
  Trigger arm's `let (table_schema, table_name) = extract_qualified_name(...)`
  doesn't shadow it.

Discovered-from: pgmold-293.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant