Add LZOP

[Schamper]

Closes #118

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 33 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (fd59c1c) to head (8bf7008).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
dissect/util/compression/lzop.py	0.00%	33 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #119   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         29      30    +1     
  Lines       2106    2139   +33     
=====================================
- Misses      2106    2139   +33     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 10.68%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 32 untouched benchmarks
🆕 2 new benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	test_benchmark_lz4_decompress[python-large]	181.9 µs	203.7 µs	-10.68%
🆕	test_benchmark_lzop_decompress[large]	N/A	218.2 µs	N/A
🆕	test_benchmark_lzop_decompress[basic]	N/A	112.1 µs	N/A

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing add-lzop (8bf7008) with main (fd59c1c)}

[Paradoxis]

Looks good to me