You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
|❓|`allPairs`|`allPairs`||[note #1](#note1"These functions require a form of pre-materializing through 'TaskSeq.cache', similar to the approach taken in the corresponding 'Seq' functions. It doesn't make much sense to have a cached async sequence. However, 'AsyncSeq' does implement these, so we'll probably do so eventually as well.")|
257
256
|✅[#81][]|`append`|`append`|||
258
257
|✅[#81][]|||`appendSeq`||
259
258
|✅[#81][]|||`prependSeq`||
@@ -267,7 +266,6 @@ This is what has been implemented so far, is planned or skipped:
|🚫|`findBack`|||[note #2](#note2"Because of the async nature of TaskSeq sequences, iterating from the back would be bad practice. Instead, materialize the sequence to a list or array and then apply the 'Back' iterators.")|
|🚫|`findIndexBack`| n/a | n/a |[note #2](#note2"Because of the async nature of TaskSeq sequences, iterating from the back would be bad practice. Instead, materialize the sequence to a list or array and then apply the 'Back' iterators.")|
293
289
|✅[#2][]|`fold`|`fold`|`foldAsync`||
294
-
|🚫|`foldBack`|||[note #2](#note2"Because of the async nature of TaskSeq sequences, iterating from the back would be bad practice. Instead, materialize the sequence to a list or array and then apply the 'Back' iterators.")|
295
-
|🚫|`foldBack2`|||[note #2](#note2"Because of the async nature of TaskSeq sequences, iterating from the back would be bad practice. Instead, materialize the sequence to a list or array and then apply the 'Back' iterators.")|
0 commit comments