+ Operators for map2 and map3#624
Merged
Merged
Conversation
wallymathieu
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2025
Member
Author
|
Before merging this, we need to decide how it will deal with the different Applicatives (Parallel vs Sequential). We could add stuff like Any better ideas? |
wallymathieu
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
||>which takes a tuple on the left side and applies each argument to a function on the right side|>>which takes a value inside a functor and maps with a function on the right sideTherefore it would make sense to have:
||>>which takes a tuple with two functors and maps with a function on the right side. The iszipandmapor simplymap2.Then it makes sense to add
|||>>and the less idiomatic flipped versions<<||and<<|||.In the wild I've seen already cases where we have pipes with
|>>and in the middle the need to switch to applicative (<!>,<*>) style, which breaks a bit the nice piping, In most of those cases these operators will be a good solution.Open question about
||>>>and|||>>>.