Solid expect clauses

[j-i-l]

Closes #190

This originated from the failing deployment test for Windows which uses the newer version of testthat.
https://github.com/furrer-lab/abn/actions/runs/24714014543/job/72285619505

We are relying on catching some exception based on content from the explanatory message which fails in a newer version (and is also bad practice).

[j-i-l]

@matteodelucchi this fixes the windows install issues and some flaky test logic we had for the build-score cache, as well as, an upcoming error in the newer version of testthat in tographvis (will fail since existing files are overwritten).

Is ready to be merged.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.51%. Comparing base (d7b018c) to head (fd7d808).
⚠️ Report is 60 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.30%   67.51%   +1.21%     
==========================================
  Files          53       50       -3     
  Lines       10399    10796     +397     
==========================================
+ Hits         6895     7289     +394     
- Misses       3504     3507       +3     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[j-i-l]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. ✅ Project coverage is 67.51%. Comparing base (d7b018c) to head (e497915). ⚠️ Report is 58 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

@matteodelucchi this looks odd with the '58 commits behind head of main', which is not at all accurate. Any idea what is going on?

[matteodelucchi]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. ✅ Project coverage is 67.51%. Comparing base (d7b018c) to head (e497915). ⚠️ Report is 58 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

@matteodelucchi this looks odd with the '58 commits behind head of main', which is not at all accurate. Any idea what is going on?

That's weird... It's also weird, that the check-CRAN action is not listed in the "Checks" Tab of this PR... I'm rerunning them to inspect it in more detail.