You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{"ts":"2026-06-16T19:27:47Z","branch":"trinity-rust-rings","msg":"feat(igla): Loop 13 — zero production panic vectors, PRM spec, June 2026 intel","files":".trinity/seals/Stdlib.json,.trinity/seals/coder_igla-coder-prm.json,.trinity/seals/fpga_Stdlib.json","notebook":"b83263109fb055dc"}
107
+
{"ts":"2026-06-16T19:28:10Z","branch":"trinity-rust-rings","msg":"fix(seals): remove stale fpga_Stdlib.json + Stdlib.json, add coder_igla-coder-prm.json","files":"","notebook":"b83263109fb055dc"}
**Strategy (executive summary, Ring 999 epochs, scorecard heuristic, CLARA/license reminders):**[`docs/COMPETITIVE_STRATEGY_RING999.md`](COMPETITIVE_STRATEGY_RING999.md).
8
-
**Claims discipline:** Strong product statements must align with [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) and [`docs/T27-CONSTITUTION.md`](T27-CONSTITUTION.md). Where this memo uses **design intent** language (e.g. CLARA-oriented bounds), it is **not** a claim of government certification.
8
+
**Claims discipline:** Strong product statements must align with [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) and [`docs/T27-CONSTITUTION.md`](T27-CONSTITUTION.md). Where this memo uses **design intent** language (e.g. CLARA-oriented bounds), it is **not** a claim of government certification.
**Status:****EXACT** algebraic identity given the definition of \(\varphi\). Any **physics reading** (“generations = 3”) is **separate** and must be labeled per [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) (e.g. **C-phi-001**).
132
+
**Status:****EXACT** algebraic identity given the definition of \(\varphi\). Any **physics reading** (“generations = 3”) is **separate** and must be labeled per [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) (e.g. **C-phi-001**).
133
133
134
134
### 3.2 GoldenFloat layout heuristic
135
135
@@ -157,15 +157,15 @@ Illustrative table (bit counts as **design targets**; exact widths are defined i
157
157
| GF24 | 24 | 9 | 14 | 0.643 | 0.025 |
158
158
| GF32 | 32 | 12 | 19 | 0.632 | 0.014 |
159
159
160
-
**Epistemic note:** Comparative **accuracy**, **dynamic range**, and **ML task Pareto** vs **IEEE fp16/bfloat16**, **posits**, or **takum** are **not** fully established in peer review from this repository alone—see **C-gf-*** rows (**UNTESTED** / validation in progress) in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md).
160
+
**Epistemic note:** Comparative **accuracy**, **dynamic range**, and **ML task Pareto** vs **IEEE fp16/bfloat16**, **posits**, or **takum** are **not** fully established in peer review from this repository alone—see **C-gf-*** rows (**UNTESTED** / validation in progress) in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md).
161
161
162
162
### 3.3 IEEE 754, posits, takum (contrast)
163
163
164
164
-**IEEE 754:** fixed split for each format (e.g. binary16: 5 exp / 10 frac bits); **not**\(\varphi\)-structured.
165
165
-**Posit:** tapered precision via **regime** run-length; variable effective precision vs magnitude.
166
166
-**Takum:** fixed fields engineered for **uniform resolution** claims in recent work—compare via **published** benchmarks, not rhetoric.
167
167
168
-
**Peer benchmark gap (GoldenFloat):** Independent **takum** results in **IEEE ARITH 2025** venue proceedings ([215900a061.pdf](https://www.arith2025.org/proceedings/215900a061.pdf)) include **sparse-solver**-style comparisons favoring takum over **bfloat16** and discuss **dynamic range** (figures on the order of **~50% wider** than bfloat16 appear in that line of work—**quote the exact passage** from the PDF in any external text). **GoldenFloat** in this repository does **not** yet ship a **matched-protocol** replication vs takum (or full IEEE/posit sweep) in a citable bundle—see [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md)**C-gf-*** rows and Ring **#129** (NMSE / benchmark spec). Until then, outreach must **not** claim numeric superiority over takum.
168
+
**Peer benchmark gap (GoldenFloat):** Independent **takum** results in **IEEE ARITH 2025** venue proceedings ([215900a061.pdf](https://www.arith2025.org/proceedings/215900a061.pdf)) include **sparse-solver**-style comparisons favoring takum over **bfloat16** and discuss **dynamic range** (figures on the order of **~50% wider** than bfloat16 appear in that line of work—**quote the exact passage** from the PDF in any external text). **GoldenFloat** in this repository does **not** yet ship a **matched-protocol** replication vs takum (or full IEEE/posit sweep) in a citable bundle—see [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md)**C-gf-*** rows and Ring **#129** (NMSE / benchmark spec). Until then, outreach must **not** claim numeric superiority over takum.
169
169
170
170
**Positioning:** GoldenFloat is a **third design axis**: fixed fields like IEEE, but **ratio-targeted** by \(\varphi\) tied to the **Trinity identity** used as a **numeric-organizing** principle.
171
171
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ Then strong Kleene **negation** can align with **sign flip** on the trit carrier
195
195
196
196
### 4.2 ASP / NAF / WFS (high level)
197
197
198
-
Answer Set Programming with **negation-as-failure** and **well-founded semantics** is a large research area. The repository contains **spec-level** scaffolding (e.g. [`specs/ar/asp_solver.t27`](../specs/ar/asp_solver.t27)); **soundness / completeness theorems** for the *implemented* engine are **not** claimed closed—[`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) lists AR pipeline claims as **conjectural** pending formalization.
198
+
Answer Set Programming with **negation-as-failure** and **well-founded semantics** is a large research area. The repository contains **spec-level** scaffolding (e.g. [`specs/ar/asp_solver.t27`](../specs/ar/asp_solver.t27)); **soundness / completeness theorems** for the *implemented* engine are **not** claimed closed—[`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) lists AR pipeline claims as **conjectural** pending formalization.
199
199
200
200
**Datalog / forward chaining (design narrative):**[`specs/ar/datalog_engine.t27`](../specs/ar/datalog_engine.t27) expresses **forward-style** derivation structure; any **\(O(\cdot)\)** complexity or **stratified-negation** story in outreach must match **measured** behavior or be labeled **conjectural**.
201
201
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ may guide **internal** process design; **do not** claim a specific **Merkle chai
317
317
318
318
### 7.4 Self-hosting / fixed point
319
319
320
-
Bootstrap narrative includes **fixed-point** milestones; **bit-exact self-host equivalence** and **formal fixed-point proof** are **not** closed claims—see [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) and [`docs/STATE_OF_THE_PROJECT.md`](STATE_OF_THE_PROJECT.md).
320
+
Bootstrap narrative includes **fixed-point** milestones; **bit-exact self-host equivalence** and **formal fixed-point proof** are **not** closed claims—see [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) and [`docs/STATE_OF_THE_PROJECT.md`](STATE_OF_THE_PROJECT.md).
321
321
322
322
### 7.5 GoldenFloat peer comparison gap
323
323
@@ -338,11 +338,11 @@ Program **goals** and **IP** terms change by **BAA** and **amendments**; use the
338
338
339
339
### 8.2 Self-hosting narrative
340
340
341
-
**Smoke / ring** evidence for bootstrap progression is **not** the same as a **published, machine-checked** fixed-point theorem. State claims **exactly** as in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md).
341
+
**Smoke / ring** evidence for bootstrap progression is **not** the same as a **published, machine-checked** fixed-point theorem. State claims **exactly** as in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md).
342
342
343
343
### 8.3 Twenty-seven agents as ISA-linked coordination
344
344
345
-
The **27 agents ↔ register alphabet** pattern ([`docs/AGENTS_ALPHABET.md`](AGENTS_ALPHABET.md) — partially non-English; **new** agent docs must be English per constitution) is a **distinctive governance metaphor** for traceability; it does **not** imply optimality vs **LangGraph**, **Mastra**, or other MAS frameworks unless evaluated on measurable criteria.
345
+
The **27 agents ↔ register alphabet** pattern ([`docs/AGENTS_ALPHABET.md`](agents/AGENTS_ALPHABET.md) — partially non-English; **new** agent docs must be English per constitution) is a **distinctive governance metaphor** for traceability; it does **not** imply optimality vs **LangGraph**, **Mastra**, or other MAS frameworks unless evaluated on measurable criteria.
**Epistemic stance:** Comparative claims below distinguish **observed product features** (from the t27 tree), **design intent**, and **hypotheses** that must be registered in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) before use in outreach.
6
+
**Epistemic stance:** Comparative claims below distinguish **observed product features** (from the t27 tree), **design intent**, and **hypotheses** that must be registered in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) before use in outreach.
7
7
8
8
---
9
9
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Unless otherwise cited, the following **badge-level** metrics are taken from the
41
41
| Module seals |**48**|
42
42
| Agent roster (organizational) |**27**|
43
43
44
-
**Honest gaps** (from state document): **cross-backend bit-exact equivalence** is **not** claimed closed; **GoldenFloat differential oracles** vs high-precision references are **in progress**; **AR / CLARA pipeline soundness** is **conjectural** in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) §1.
44
+
**Honest gaps** (from state document): **cross-backend bit-exact equivalence** is **not** claimed closed; **GoldenFloat differential oracles** vs high-precision references are **in progress**; **AR / CLARA pipeline soundness** is **conjectural** in [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) §1.
45
45
46
46
---
47
47
@@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ These systems **generate** structural RTL or IR from a higher-level description;
104
104
| DeepProbLog (line of work) | Neural + Prolog | Probabilistic reasoning | Hardware codegen not the focus |
105
105
|**CogSys** (IBM, [HPCA 2025](https://arxiv.org/html/2503.01162v1)) | Neuro-symbolic **accelerator** stack on **binary** hardware | Reported **large** speedups with low overhead in venue/preprint materials |**No** native balanced-ternary ISA / **`.t27`** SSOT; different integration point than t27 |
106
106
|**NSFlow** ([DAC 2025](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19323)) |**FPGA** NeSy acceleration framework | Reported **order-of-magnitude** gains vs software baselines in preprint |**No** K3-first spec corpus + GoldenFloat + multi-backend **generator** story as in t27 |
107
-
| DARPA [CLARA](https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/clara)|**Government program** (not a single repo) | Compositional ML+AR; explainability / assurance goals |**Not** “a compiler you install”; t27’s [`clara-bridge/`](../clara-bridge/) and [`specs/ar/`](../../specs/ar/) are **preparation / alignment** artifacts |
107
+
| DARPA [CLARA](https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/clara)|**Government program** (not a single repo) | Compositional ML+AR; explainability / assurance goals |**Not** “a compiler you install”; t27’s [`clara-bridge/`](../clara-bridge/) and [`specs/ar/`](../specs/ar/) are **preparation / alignment** artifacts |
108
108
109
-
**Epistemic note:** t27 documentation describes **targeting** CLARA-style assurance; **formal “compliance”** is **not** a closed engineering claim—see [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) (CLARA / AR row: `conjectural`).
109
+
**Epistemic note:** t27 documentation describes **targeting** CLARA-style assurance; **formal “compliance”** is **not** a closed engineering claim—see [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) (CLARA / AR row: `conjectural`).
110
110
111
111
### 3.5 Ternary and multi-valued logic (research and libraries)
112
112
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ The following are **plausible structural gaps** in *combinations* of public tool
174
174
175
175
1.**t27** occupies a **sparse intersection** of **spec-first multi-backend generation**, **ternary / AR specs**, and **research-software hygiene** (conformance, seals, claims registry)—with **known incompleteness** on **numeric oracles** and **formal AR proofs**.
176
176
2.**Nearest mature competitors** for **RTL generation** remain **Chisel/FIRRTL** and **MLIR/CIRCT-class** infrastructures; **nearest** for **assurance narratives** are **program-level** efforts (e.g. **CLARA**) and **neuro-symbolic languages**, not single repositories.
177
-
3.**Scientific communication** should route **strong differentiators** through [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) and keep this memo as a **living** appendix—**version** with major releases.
177
+
3.**Scientific communication** should route **strong differentiators** through [`docs/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md`](nona-03-manifest/RESEARCH_CLAIMS.md) and keep this memo as a **living** appendix—**version** with major releases.
178
178
179
179
---
180
180
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ The following are **plausible structural gaps** in *combinations* of public tool
0 commit comments