Skip to content

feat(plan-eng-review): flag optimistic-UI on a server-gated action as a code-quality check #1874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
timlinnet wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+2 −0
Open

feat(plan-eng-review): flag optimistic-UI on a server-gated action as a code-quality check #1874

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions plan-eng-review/sections/review-sections.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ Evaluate:
* Code organization and module structure.
* DRY violations—be aggressive here.
* Error handling patterns and missing edge cases (call these out explicitly).
* Server-gated or actuated actions with optimistic UI—does the client await and surface the real result, or assume success? A swallowed rejection (auth/permission/validation) renders as false success; verify the effect landed, not the toast.
* Technical debt hotspots.
* Areas that are over-engineered or under-engineered relative to my preferences.
* Existing ASCII diagrams in touched files — are they still accurate after this change?
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions plan-eng-review/sections/review-sections.md.tmpl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Evaluate:
* Code organization and module structure.
* DRY violations—be aggressive here.
* Error handling patterns and missing edge cases (call these out explicitly).
* Server-gated or actuated actions with optimistic UI—does the client await and surface the real result, or assume success? A swallowed rejection (auth/permission/validation) renders as false success; verify the effect landed, not the toast.
* Technical debt hotspots.
* Areas that are over-engineered or under-engineered relative to my preferences.
* Existing ASCII diagrams in touched files — are they still accurate after this change?
Expand Down