From 3aea414aa2e5f1e0e915f58a434c01428a90382c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Levasseur Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 19:52:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] refactor: also rename host toolchain impl function name (#2930) The implementation function name got missed when the repo rule name itself was changed. --- python/private/toolchains_repo.bzl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/python/private/toolchains_repo.bzl b/python/private/toolchains_repo.bzl index cf4373932b..2476889583 100644 --- a/python/private/toolchains_repo.bzl +++ b/python/private/toolchains_repo.bzl @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ actions.""", environ = [REPO_DEBUG_ENV_VAR], ) -def _host_toolchain_impl(rctx): +def _host_compatible_python_repo(rctx): rctx.file("BUILD.bazel", _HOST_TOOLCHAIN_BUILD_CONTENT) os_name = repo_utils.get_platforms_os_name(rctx) @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ def _host_toolchain_impl(rctx): # NOTE: The term "toolchain" is a misnomer for this rule. This doesn't define # a repo with toolchains or toolchain implementations. host_compatible_python_repo = repository_rule( - _host_toolchain_impl, + _host_compatible_python_repo, doc = """\ Creates a repository with a shorter name meant to be used in the repository_ctx, which needs to have `symlinks` for the interpreter. This is separate from the