Skip to content

dive home review#234

Merged
tomkralidis merged 1 commit into
geopython:mainfrom
pvgenuchten:dive-review
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

dive home review#234
tomkralidis merged 1 commit into
geopython:mainfrom
pvgenuchten:dive-review

Conversation

@pvgenuchten

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • add link on let's go
  • fix some links in standards

mainly to ogc roadmap, which was refering to the non public instance (agora)

@tomkralidis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @pvgenuchten. Will wait for @doublebyte1 feedback on roadmap link.

@jmckenna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

re Roadmap: ogc.org references this roadmap: Standards Roadmap

@tomkralidis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ogc.org

Thanks @jmckenna. The question then becomes whether to use https://www.ogc.org/standards/roadmap/ or Standards Roadmap.

My vote would be for https://www.ogc.org/standards/roadmap (provides further context, futureproofs changing roadmap URLs), thoughts?

@jmckenna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

My vote would be for https://www.ogc.org/standards/roadmap (provides further context, futureproofs changing roadmap URLs), thoughts?

agreed with your vote (use the ogc.org link instead)

@tomkralidis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

My vote would be for https://www.ogc.org/standards/roadmap (provides further context, futureproofs changing roadmap URLs), thoughts?

agreed with your vote (use the ogc.org link instead)

Thanks @jmckenna. @doublebyte1 works for you?

@doublebyte1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

My vote would be for https://www.ogc.org/standards/roadmap (provides further context, futureproofs changing roadmap URLs), thoughts?

agreed with your vote (use the ogc.org link instead)

Thanks @jmckenna. @doublebyte1 works for you?

+1 ; if we use this wrapper, we will be safe in case OGC switches to use a different tool in the future.

@tomkralidis tomkralidis merged commit d70eb83 into geopython:main Jun 24, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants