rfc(decision): Prevent duplicate AI Client Spans

Author: alexander-alderman-webb

README.md

@@ -71,3 +71,4 @@ This repository contains RFCs and DACIs. Lost?
 - [0146-automatic-in-app-rules](text/0146-automatic-in-app-rules.md): For Java projects, when a code mapping is automatically created, also create an in-app stack trace rules to categorize the frames as in-app
 - [0148-logs-for-crashes](text/0148-logs-for-crashes.md): Logs for Crashes
 - [0149-merge-bundler-plugins](text/0149-merge-bundler-plugins.md): Merge sentry-javascript-bundler-plugins into sentry-javascript
+- [0155-prevent-duplicate-ai-client-spans](text/0155-prevent-duplicate-ai-client-spans.md): Prevent duplicate AI Client Spans

text/0155-prevent-duplicate-ai-client-spans.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+- Start Date: 2026-03-09
+- RFC Type: decision
+- RFC PR: https://github.com/getsentry/rfcs/pull/155
+- RFC Status: draft
+
+# Summary
+
+One paragraph explanation of the feature or document purpose.
+
+# Motivation
+
+Why are we doing this? What use cases does it support? What is the expected outcome?
+
+# Background
+
+The reason this decision or document is required. This section might not always exist.
+
+# Supporting Data
+
+[Metrics to help support your decision (if applicable).]
+
+# Options Considered
+
+If an RFC does not know yet what the options are, it can propose multiple options. The
+preferred model is to propose one option and to provide alternatives.
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+Why should we not do this? What are the drawbacks of this RFC or a particular option if
+multiple options are presented.
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+- What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through this RFC?
+- What issues are out of scope for this RFC but are known?