Use head_info rather than stacks or stack_details when possible#13904
Use head_info rather than stacks or stack_details when possible#13904Caleb-T-Owens wants to merge 2 commits into
head_info rather than stacks or stack_details when possible#13904Conversation
4cbfd44 to
f7e416e
Compare
f7e416e to
7a2e646
Compare
cec2bc9 to
e27c1f1
Compare
We still need some usage of `stacks` for the branch listing page AFAIK, but using `head_info` for the main projection is a big help since it avoids the issues with some strange inconsistency issues between `stack_details` and `stacks`.
e27c1f1 to
deaeac0
Compare
bae9c5e to
56545d8
Compare
|
@Caleb-T-Owens Smoke tests failed with That's not related to the code in this PR (see this comment) and probably a spurious error, but it's still worrying. My best guess is that it's the background sync interfering with the next command being executed. |
|
I think there is a way to turn backtraces on with Then once it's clear where this is happening, it can be fixed. |
We still need some usage of
stacksfor the branch listing page AFAIK, but usinghead_infofor the main projection is a big help since it avoids the issues with some strange inconsistency issues betweenstack_detailsandstacks.