Fix openIssue array signature and category tests after merge

Author: taarikashenafi

.github/actions/file/src/openIssue.ts

@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ export async function openIssue(octokit: Octokit, repoWithOwner: string, finding
     labels.push(`${primary.scannerType} rule: ${primary.ruleId}`)
   }
   // Flag non-WCAG findings so they can be filtered or triaged separately
-  if (finding.category && finding.category !== 'wcag') {
-    labels.push(finding.category)
+  if (primary.category && primary.category !== 'wcag') {
+    labels.push(primary.category)
   }
 
   const count = findings.length

.github/actions/file/tests/openIssue.test.ts

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ describe('openIssue', () => {
 
   it('adds a category label for non-WCAG findings', async () => {
     const octokit = mockOctokit()
-    await openIssue(octokit, 'org/repo', {...baseFinding, category: 'best-practice'})
+    await openIssue(octokit, 'org/repo', [{...baseFinding, category: 'best-practice'}])
 
     expect(octokit.request).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
       expect.any(String),
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ describe('openIssue', () => {
 
   it('does not add a category label for WCAG findings', async () => {
     const octokit = mockOctokit()
-    await openIssue(octokit, 'org/repo', {...baseFinding, category: 'wcag'})
+    await openIssue(octokit, 'org/repo', [{...baseFinding, category: 'wcag'}])
 
     const labels = octokit.request.mock.calls[0][1].labels
     expect(labels).not.toContain('wcag')