|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +name: unit-test-vue-pinia |
| 3 | +category: testing |
| 4 | +description: 'Write and review unit tests for Vue 3 + TypeScript + Vitest + Pinia codebases. Use when creating or updating tests for components, composables, and stores; mocking Pinia with createTestingPinia; applying Vue Test Utils patterns; and enforcing black-box assertions over implementation details.' |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +# unit-test-vue-pinia |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +Use this skill to create or review unit tests for Vue components, composables, and Pinia stores. Keep tests small, deterministic, and behavior-first. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## Workflow |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +1. Identify the behavior boundary first: component UI behavior, composable behavior, or store behavior. |
| 14 | +2. Choose the narrowest test style that can prove that behavior. |
| 15 | +3. Set up Pinia with the least powerful option that still covers the scenario. |
| 16 | +4. Drive the test through public inputs such as props, form updates, button clicks, emitted child events, and store APIs. |
| 17 | +5. Assert observable outputs and side effects before considering any instance-level assertion. |
| 18 | +6. Return or review tests with clear behavior-oriented names and note any remaining coverage gaps. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Core Rules |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +- Test one behavior per test. |
| 23 | +- Assert observable input/output behavior first (rendered text, emitted events, callback calls, store state changes). |
| 24 | +- Avoid implementation-coupled assertions. |
| 25 | +- Access `wrapper.vm` only in exceptional cases when there is no reasonable DOM, prop, emit, or store-level assertion. |
| 26 | +- Prefer explicit setup in `beforeEach()` and reset mocks every test. |
| 27 | +- Use checked-in reference material in `references/pinia-patterns.md` as the local source of truth for standard Pinia test setups. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +## Pinia Testing Approach |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +Use `references/pinia-patterns.md` first, then fall back to Pinia's testing cookbook when the checked-in examples do not cover the case. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +### Default pattern for component tests |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +Use `createTestingPinia` as a global plugin while mounting. |
| 36 | +Prefer `createSpy: vi.fn` as the default for consistency and easier action-spy assertions. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +```ts |
| 39 | +const wrapper = mount(ComponentUnderTest, { |
| 40 | + global: { |
| 41 | + plugins: [ |
| 42 | + createTestingPinia({ |
| 43 | + createSpy: vi.fn, |
| 44 | + }), |
| 45 | + ], |
| 46 | + }, |
| 47 | +}); |
| 48 | +``` |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +By default, actions are stubbed and spied. |
| 51 | +Use `stubActions: true` (default) when the test only needs to verify whether an action was called (or not called). |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +### Accepted minimal Pinia setups |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +The following are also valid and should not be flagged as incorrect: |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +- `createTestingPinia({})` when the test does not assert Pinia action spy behavior. |
| 58 | +- `createTestingPinia({ initialState: ... })` or `createTestingPinia({ stubActions: ... })` without `createSpy`, when the test only needs state seeding or action stubbing behavior and does not inspect generated spies. |
| 59 | +- `setActivePinia(createTestingPinia(...))` in store/composable-focused tests (without mounting a component) when mocking/seeding dependent stores is needed. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +Use `createSpy: vi.fn` when action spy assertions are part of the test intent. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +### Execute real actions only when needed |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +Use `stubActions: false` only when the test must validate the action's real behavior and side effects. Do not switch it on by default for simple "was called" assertions. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +```ts |
| 68 | +const wrapper = mount(ComponentUnderTest, { |
| 69 | + global: { |
| 70 | + plugins: [ |
| 71 | + createTestingPinia({ |
| 72 | + createSpy: vi.fn, |
| 73 | + stubActions: false, |
| 74 | + }), |
| 75 | + ], |
| 76 | + }, |
| 77 | +}); |
| 78 | +``` |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +### Seed store state with `initialState` |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +```ts |
| 83 | +const wrapper = mount(ComponentUnderTest, { |
| 84 | + global: { |
| 85 | + plugins: [ |
| 86 | + createTestingPinia({ |
| 87 | + createSpy: vi.fn, |
| 88 | + initialState: { |
| 89 | + counter: { n: 20 }, |
| 90 | + user: { name: "Leia Organa" }, |
| 91 | + }, |
| 92 | + }), |
| 93 | + ], |
| 94 | + }, |
| 95 | +}); |
| 96 | +``` |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +### Add Pinia plugins through `createTestingPinia` |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +```ts |
| 101 | +const wrapper = mount(ComponentUnderTest, { |
| 102 | + global: { |
| 103 | + plugins: [ |
| 104 | + createTestingPinia({ |
| 105 | + createSpy: vi.fn, |
| 106 | + plugins: [myPiniaPlugin], |
| 107 | + }), |
| 108 | + ], |
| 109 | + }, |
| 110 | +}); |
| 111 | +``` |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +### Getter override pattern for edge cases |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +```ts |
| 116 | +const pinia = createTestingPinia({ createSpy: vi.fn }); |
| 117 | +const store = useCounterStore(pinia); |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +store.double = 999; |
| 120 | +// @ts-expect-error test-only reset of overridden getter |
| 121 | +store.double = undefined; |
| 122 | +``` |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +### Pure store unit tests |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +Prefer pure store tests with `createPinia()` when the goal is to validate store state transitions and action behavior without component rendering. Use `createTestingPinia()` only when you need stubbed dependent stores, seeded test doubles, or action spies. |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +```ts |
| 129 | +beforeEach(() => { |
| 130 | + setActivePinia(createPinia()); |
| 131 | +}); |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +it("increments", () => { |
| 134 | + const counter = useCounterStore(); |
| 135 | + counter.increment(); |
| 136 | + expect(counter.n).toBe(1); |
| 137 | +}); |
| 138 | +``` |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +## Vue Test Utils Approach |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +Follow Vue Test Utils guidance: <https://test-utils.vuejs.org/guide/> |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +- Mount shallow by default for focused unit tests. |
| 145 | +- Mount full component trees only when integration behavior is the subject. |
| 146 | +- Drive behavior through props, user-like interactions, and emitted events. |
| 147 | +- Prefer `findComponent(...).vm.$emit(...)` for child stub events instead of touching parent internals. |
| 148 | +- Use `nextTick` only when updates are async. |
| 149 | +- Assert emitted events and payloads with `wrapper.emitted(...)`. |
| 150 | +- Access `wrapper.vm` only when no DOM assertion, emitted event assertion, prop assertion, or store-level assertion can express the behavior. Treat it as an exception and keep the assertion narrowly scoped. |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +## Key Testing Snippets |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +Emit and assert payload: |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +```ts |
| 157 | +await wrapper.find("button").trigger("click"); |
| 158 | +expect(wrapper.emitted("submit")?.[0]?.[0]).toBe("Mango Mission"); |
| 159 | +``` |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +Update input and assert output: |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +```ts |
| 164 | +await wrapper.find("input").setValue("Agent Violet"); |
| 165 | +await wrapper.find("form").trigger("submit"); |
| 166 | +expect(wrapper.emitted("save")?.[0]?.[0]).toBe("Agent Violet"); |
| 167 | +``` |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +## Test Writing Workflow |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +1. Identify the behavior boundary to test. |
| 172 | +2. Build minimal fixture data (only fields needed by that behavior). |
| 173 | +3. Configure Pinia and required test doubles. |
| 174 | +4. Trigger behavior through public inputs. |
| 175 | +5. Assert public outputs and side effects. |
| 176 | +6. Refactor test names to describe behavior, not implementation. |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +## Constraints and Safety |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +- Do not test private/internal implementation details. |
| 181 | +- Do not overuse snapshots for dynamic UI behavior. |
| 182 | +- Do not assert every field in large objects if only one behavior matters. |
| 183 | +- Keep fake data deterministic; avoid random values. |
| 184 | +- Do not claim a Pinia setup is wrong when it is one of the accepted minimal setups above. |
| 185 | +- Do not rewrite working tests toward deeper mounting or real actions unless the behavior under test requires that extra surface area. |
| 186 | +- Flag missing test coverage, brittle selectors, and implementation-coupled assertions explicitly during review. |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +## Output Contract |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +- For `create` or `update`, return the finished test code plus a short note describing the selected Pinia strategy. |
| 191 | +- For `review`, return concrete findings first, then missing coverage or brittleness risks. |
| 192 | +- When the safest choice is ambiguous, state the assumption that drove the chosen test setup. |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +## References |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +- `references/pinia-patterns.md` |
| 197 | +- Pinia testing cookbook: <https://pinia.vuejs.org/cookbook/testing.html> |
| 198 | +- Vue Test Utils guide: <https://test-utils.vuejs.org/guide/> |
0 commit comments