Merge pull request #4346 from RasmusWL/python-add-implicit-init-test

Python: add test for implicit __init__.py files

Author: tausbn

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/PointsTo.expected

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+debug_missingAnnotationForCallable
+debug_nonUniqueAnnotationForCallable
+debug_missingAnnotationForCall
+expectedCallEdgeNotFound
+| example.py:19:1:19:7 | afunc() | foo/bar/a.py:2:1:2:12 | Function afunc |
+unexpectedCallEdgeFound

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/PointsTo.qlref

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../CallGraph/PointsTo.ql

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/Relative.expected

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+debug_missingAnnotationForCallable
+debug_nonUniqueAnnotationForCallable
+debug_missingAnnotationForCall
+pointsTo_found_typeTracker_notFound
+| example.py:22:1:22:16 | explicit_afunc() | foo_explicit/bar/a.py:2:1:2:21 | Function explicit_afunc |
+pointsTo_notFound_typeTracker_found

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/Relative.qlref

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../CallGraph/Relative.ql

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/TypeTracker.expected

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+debug_missingAnnotationForCallable
+debug_nonUniqueAnnotationForCallable
+debug_missingAnnotationForCall
+expectedCallEdgeNotFound
+| example.py:19:1:19:7 | afunc() | foo/bar/a.py:2:1:2:12 | Function afunc |
+| example.py:22:1:22:16 | explicit_afunc() | foo_explicit/bar/a.py:2:1:2:21 | Function explicit_afunc |
+unexpectedCallEdgeFound

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/TypeTracker.qlref

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../CallGraph/TypeTracker.ql

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/example.py

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+"""
+Test that we can resolve callables correctly without using explicit __init__.py files
+
+This is not included in the standard `CallGraph/code` folder, since we're testing our
+understanding import work properly, so it's better to have a clean test setup that is
+obviously correct (the other one isn't in regards to imports).
+
+Technically this is part of PEP 420 -- Implicit Namespace Packages, but does use the
+*real* namespace package feature of allowing source code for a single package to reside
+in multiple places.
+
+Since PEP 420 was accepted in Python 3, this test is Python 3 only.
+"""
+
+from foo.bar.a import afunc
+from foo_explicit.bar.a import explicit_afunc
+
+# calls:afunc
+afunc()
+
+# calls:explicit_afunc
+explicit_afunc()

python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/foo/bar/a.py

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# name:afunc
+def afunc():
+  print("afunc called")
+  return 1