Duplicate lines in code-scanning docs

[bo0tzz]

Code of Conduct

• I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/enabling-code-scanning/configuring-default-setup-for-code-scanning-at-scale#eligible-repositories-for-codeql-default-setup-at-scale

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

The "Eligible repositories" section mentions GitHub Actions are enabled. twice.

Additional information

No response

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this issue. A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

[Sharra-writes]

Thanks for opening an issue! That's definitely a mistake, so you or anyone else can open a PR to fix it. 💛

[bo0tzz]

That was my first instinct, but there's some templating going on that I couldn't quite find my way through.

docs/content/code-security/code-scanning/enabling-code-scanning/configuring-default-setup-for-code-scanning-at-scale.md

Lines 47 to 50 in fcbda1b

	* Advanced setup for {% data variables.product.prodname_code_scanning %} is not already enabled.
	* {% data variables.product.prodname_actions %} are enabled.{% ifversion default-setup-pre-enablement %}
	* Uses Go, JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, or Ruby.{% endif %}
	{% data reusables.code-scanning.require-actions-ghcs %}

[Sharra-writes]

@bo0tzz Thankfully I'm pretty sure this one is an easy fix. Line 48 just needs to be deleted up to that first curly bracket in the code that starts {% ifversion, because the same text is included in the reusable on line 50. If you want to make that change, I can preview it to make sure it does what it's supposed to, or you can check it out in a codespace if you know how, and attach a screenshot. Either way would be fine! Or you could let someone else from the community jump in to fix it. 💛