You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/src/content/docs/reference/faq.md
+2Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ sidebar:
14
14
15
15
We fully embrace the need for deterministic CI/CD, especially in build, release, and test pipelines. Agentic workflows are **100% additive** to your existing CI/CD - they don't replace or modify your deterministic pipelines.
16
16
17
+
Another way to look at it is that this is about something new and additive: **Continuous AI** in addition to **Continuous Integration** and **Continuous Deployment** - a new leg to make a trifecta. It just happens to run in GitHub Actions because that's where infrastructure for secure execution, permissions, and repository context is found. It's a new addition to your automation toolkit, not a replacement for existing workflows.
18
+
17
19
Think of it this way: your build, test, and release workflows should remain fully deterministic and reproducible. Agentic workflows complement these by handling tasks that are inherently non-deterministic anyway - like triaging issues, drafting documentation, researching dependencies, or proposing code improvements for human review.
18
20
19
21
The key insight is that many valuable automation tasks don't require determinism. When a coding agent reviews an issue and suggests a label, or drafts release notes from commits, the exact wording doesn't need to be reproducible - it needs to be helpful. Agentic workflows excel at these judgment-based tasks while your critical CI/CD pipelines remain unchanged.
0 commit comments