[cache-strategy] Cache Strategy Analysis - 2026-06-16 #39662
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-06-17T19:43:57.926Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Cache Strategy Analysis Report
Date: 2026-06-16
Runs Analyzed: 14
Workflows with cache-memory: 12
Executive Summary
The last 24 hours were mostly healthy. The stable scheduled workflows that actually reuse persisted state showed restore-key hits and no sustained miss streaks. Several smoke-test workflows ran on branch-scoped or first-run cache keys, but they did not produce a repeated pattern severe enough to justify a new issue today.
No workflows crossed the issue thresholds for critical, high, or medium severity. The existing cache-strategy tracker was updated with today's run records and historical rollups.
Findings
🔴 Critical Issues
None.
🟠 High Priority
None.
🟡 Medium Priority
None.
Healthy Workflows
Issues Created Today
No new issues created - all problems are already tracked or below threshold.
💾 Cache Memory Summary
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-strategy/Report generated by the Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer
References: §27639069573, §27636917204, §27636155593
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions