[cache-strategy] Cache Strategy Analysis - 2026-07-11

[github-actions[bot]]

Caution

agentic threat detected
Threat detection flagged this output in warn mode. Manual review is REQUIRED before any follow-up automation.

Details

The threat detection engine failed to produce results.

Review the workflow run logs for details.

Cache Strategy Analysis Report

Date: 2026-07-11
Runs Analyzed: 4
Workflows with cache-memory: 4

---

Executive Summary

Today’s cache-memory runs were mostly healthy. Three workflows restored and persisted cache state without any miss signals, and none crossed the miss-streak or miss-rate thresholds for escalation.

One workflow, Smoke OpenCode, failed before any observable cache-memory interaction in the available run artifacts. That is a runtime failure, but not evidence of a cache-strategy defect by itself.

---

Findings

🟠 High Priority

No high-priority cache-strategy findings today.

🟡 Medium Priority

No medium-priority cache-strategy findings today.

Healthy Workflows

• Agent Persona Explorer - cache restored and updated; no miss signals.
• Daily Formal Spec Verifier - cache restored and updated; no miss signals.
• Daily SPDD Spec Planner - cache restored and updated; no miss signals.

Uncertain / non-actionable

Smoke OpenCode completed with a workflow failure before any observable cache-memory interaction. The available artifacts do not show a cache miss pattern, volatile cache key, or stale cache read.

---

Issues Created Today

No new issues created — no workflow met the configured escalation thresholds.

💾 Cache Memory Summary

• Total workflows tracked: 4
• Runs recorded (last 30d): updated with 4 new entries
• Cache memory location: /tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/cache-strategy/
• Next pruning date: 2026-08-10

---

Report generated by the Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer

Generated by 📊 Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer · 10.5 AIC · ⊞ 12.5K · ◷

• expires on Jul 12, 2026, 10:47 AM UTC-08:00

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer.

A newer discussion is available at Discussion #45121.