Skip to content

[Bug]: Brenn Hill paper claimed that spec kit is not useful #3357

Description

@Sandy4321

Bug Description

These tools are being sold on empirical claims that have never been empirically tested. We
have now tested them. The claims are false

is written in
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6515898
https://github.com/brennhill/delivery-gap-research

Steps to Reproduce

use code in
https://github.com/brennhill/delivery-gap-research

Expected Behavior

statistical and factual evidence spec kit is useful

Actual Behavior

These tools are being sold on empirical claims that have never been empirically tested. We
have now tested them. The claims are false

is written in
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6515898
https://github.com/brennhill/delivery-gap-research

Specify CLI Version

any

AI Agent

Amp

Operating System

any

Python Version

any

Error Logs

These tools are being sold on empirical claims that have never been empirically tested. We
have now tested them. The claims are false

is written in 
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6515898
https://github.com/brennhill/delivery-gap-research

Additional Context

These tools are being sold on empirical claims that have never been empirically tested. We
have now tested them. The claims are false

is written in
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6515898
https://github.com/brennhill/delivery-gap-research

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions