What is the conjecture
Let $f: \omega_{\omega+1} \to [\omega_{\omega+1}]^{\leq \aleph_\omega}$ be a set mapping such that $|f(\alpha) \cap f(\beta)| < \aleph_\omega$ for all $\alpha \neq \beta$. Under the generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH), the question asks: does there exist a free set of cardinality $\aleph_{\omega+1}$?
Here, $\omega_{\omega+1}$ denotes the ordinal number $\omega+1$, and $[\omega_{\omega+1}]^{\leq \aleph_\omega}$ is the collection of all subsets of $\omega_{\omega+1}$ with cardinality at most $\aleph_\omega$. A free set for the mapping $f$ is a subset $S \subseteq \omega_{\omega+1}$ such that for any distinct elements $\alpha, \beta \in S$, the set $f(\alpha)$ and $f(\beta)$ satisfy certain independence properties related to the constraint $|f(\alpha) \cap f(\beta)| < \aleph_\omega$.
(This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.)
Sources:
Prerequisites needed
Formalizability Rating: 3/5 (0 is best) (as of 2026-02-01)
Building blocks (from Mathlib):
-
Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic: Cardinal numbers, basic arithmetic operations
-
Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Aleph: Aleph hierarchy ($\aleph_0, \aleph_1, \ldots$), indexed by ordinals
-
Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order: Cardinal ordering and supremum operations
Missing pieces:
-
Definition of "free set": The notion of a free set in this context requires a formal definition capturing the independence condition $|f(\alpha) \cap f(\beta)| < \aleph_\omega$. This is a specialized concept from infinite combinatorics not yet in Mathlib.
-
GCH assumption framework: While cardinal arithmetic is formalized, formalizing statements under the generalized continuum hypothesis requires either a formal axiom or a conditional framework for carrying GCH assumptions through proofs.
Rating justification (3): Mathlib has solid infrastructure for cardinal arithmetic and the aleph hierarchy, but the problem statement requires defining the specialized notion of a "free set" and properly handling the GCH assumption. These additions constitute moderate infrastructure work beyond the core cardinal definitions already available.
Choose either option
This issue was generated by an AI agent and reviewed by me.
See more information here: link
Feedback on mistakes/hallucinations: link
What is the conjecture
Let$f: \omega_{\omega+1} \to [\omega_{\omega+1}]^{\leq \aleph_\omega}$ be a set mapping such that $|f(\alpha) \cap f(\beta)| < \aleph_\omega$ for all $\alpha \neq \beta$ . Under the generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH), the question asks: does there exist a free set of cardinality $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ ?
Here,$\omega_{\omega+1}$ denotes the ordinal number $\omega+1$ , and $[\omega_{\omega+1}]^{\leq \aleph_\omega}$ is the collection of all subsets of $\omega_{\omega+1}$ with cardinality at most $\aleph_\omega$ . A free set for the mapping $f$ is a subset $S \subseteq \omega_{\omega+1}$ such that for any distinct elements $\alpha, \beta \in S$ , the set $f(\alpha)$ and $f(\beta)$ satisfy certain independence properties related to the constraint $|f(\alpha) \cap f(\beta)| < \aleph_\omega$ .
(This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.)
Sources:
Prerequisites needed
Formalizability Rating: 3/5 (0 is best) (as of 2026-02-01)
Building blocks (from Mathlib):
Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic: Cardinal numbers, basic arithmetic operationsMathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Aleph: Aleph hierarchy (Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order: Cardinal ordering and supremum operationsMissing pieces:
Rating justification (3): Mathlib has solid infrastructure for cardinal arithmetic and the aleph hierarchy, but the problem statement requires defining the specialized notion of a "free set" and properly handling the GCH assumption. These additions constitute moderate infrastructure work beyond the core cardinal definitions already available.
AMS categories
Choose either option
This issue was generated by an AI agent and reviewed by me.
See more information here: link
Feedback on mistakes/hallucinations: link