Feat: integrate code review extension in PR workflow instead of using customized review prompt#471
Conversation
|
🤖 Hi @cynthialong0-0, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
cynthialong0-0
requested review from
R2wenD2,
mattKorwel and
verbanicm
and removed request for
R2wenD2,
mattKorwel and
verbanicm
Signed-off-by: cynthialong0-0 <82900738+cynthialong0-0@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @cynthialong0-0, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
1 similar comment
|
🤖 Hi @cynthialong0-0, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
|
🤖 I'm sorry @cynthialong0-0, but I was unable to process your request. Please see the logs for more details. |
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @cocosheng-g, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
1 similar comment
|
🤖 Hi @cocosheng-g, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @cynthialong0-0, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @cynthialong0-0, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
![gemini-cli[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1473539?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This Pull Request successfully updates the PR review workflow to integrate the dedicated code-review extension instead of using customized local prompts. However, there are a few critical issues with the configuration of the GitHub MCP server in the workflow files that will cause deployment failures and need to be fixed before merging.
🔍 General Feedback
- Docker Environment Variables: The current modifications to how
GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKENis passed viadocker run -ein.github/workflows/gemini-invoke.ymlintroduces a breakage. Variables inside theargsarray bypass shell evaluation and are therefore passed as literals rather than pulling the value from theenvblock. - Workflow Action References: Make sure any workflow file referencing a testing branch is reverted back to pointing at
@main. - Evals Stability: Relying on runtime HTTP requests to fetch files during evaluation testing can introduce non-deterministic failures. Whenever feasible, favor using mocked local fixtures over remote file downloads to keep evaluations isolated.
## What's Changed * feat: expand eval dataset with edge and complex cases and refine prompts by @cocosheng-g in #458 * chore: parallelize nightly evaluations and fix suite timeouts by @cocosheng-g in #472 * docs: update an authentication documentation link by @Marukome0743 in #445 * Fix summary Markdown formatting by @Kevinrob in #474 * fix: typo workflow_name on gemini-plan-execute by @Marukome0743 in #476 * Feat: integrate code review extension in PR workflow instead of using customized review prompt by @cynthialong0-0 in #471 * feat: add GitHub Action usage metrics for telemetry by @cocosheng-g in #475 * fix: remove unused service and redundant IAM bindings in workload identity setup script by @anguillanneuf in #481 * Fix: Add workflow name to telemetry resource attributes by @cocosheng-g in #493 * fix(evals): stabilize nightly evaluation suite by @cocosheng-g in #494 * create trust guidance docs by @ehedlund in #501 ## New Contributors * @Kevinrob made their first contribution in #474 * @anguillanneuf made their first contribution in #481 * @ehedlund made their first contribution in #501 **Full Changelog**: v0.1.21...v0.1.22
3 participants
Overview
This PR integrates code review extension (https://github.com/gemini-cli-extensions/code-review) in the PR workflow.
fixes #468
Changes
Next step