Skip to content

[Explicit State Access] Support multiple State Reads nodes for a single State Element in proc_state_legalization_pass#4202

Draft
copybara-service[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test_910694399
Draft

[Explicit State Access] Support multiple State Reads nodes for a single State Element in proc_state_legalization_pass#4202
copybara-service[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test_910694399

Conversation

@copybara-service
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@copybara-service copybara-service Bot commented May 5, 2026

[Explicit State Access] Support multiple State Reads nodes for a single State Element in proc_state_legalization_pass

Prevent nullptr from attempting to fetch State Reads from Next Nodes constructed from a State Element.

#geminiassisted

…le State Element in proc_state_legalization_pass

Prevent nullptr from attempting to fetch State Reads from Next Nodes constructed from a State Element.

#geminiassisted

PiperOrigin-RevId: 910694399
@copybara-service copybara-service Bot changed the title [Explicit State Access] Support multiple State Reads nodes per State Element in proc_state_legalization_pass [Explicit State Access] Support multiple State Reads nodes for a single State Element in proc_state_legalization_pass May 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant