@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ Status HasRow(std::shared_ptr<google::cloud::bigtable::emulator::Table>& table,
273273//
274274// Supplied with a timestamp < -1, it should return an error and fail the entire
275275// mutation chain.
276- TEST (TransactonRollback , ZeroOrNegativeTimestampHandling) {
276+ TEST (TransactionRollback , ZeroOrNegativeTimestampHandling) {
277277 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
278278 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
279279
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, ZeroOrNegativeTimestampHandling) {
363363}
364364
365365// Does the SetCell mutation work to set a cell to a specific value?
366- TEST (TransactonRollback , SetCellBasicFunction) {
366+ TEST (TransactionRollback , SetCellBasicFunction) {
367367 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
368368 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
369369
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, SetCellBasicFunction) {
396396// Test that an old value is correctly restored in a pre-populated
397397// cell, when one of a set of SetCell mutations fails after the cell
398398// had been updated with a new value.
399- TEST (TransactonRollback , TestRestoreValue) {
399+ TEST (TransactionRollback , TestRestoreValue) {
400400 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
401401 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
402402
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, TestRestoreValue) {
459459
460460// Test that a new cell introduced in a chain of SetCell mutations is
461461// deleted on rollback if a subsequent mutation fails.
462- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteValue) {
462+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteValue) {
463463 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
464464 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
465465
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, DeleteValue) {
514514// column family name that is not in the table schema) then the column
515515// and any of the cells introduced is deleted in the rollback, but
516516// that any pre-transaction-attemot data in the row is unaffected.
517- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteColumn) {
517+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteColumn) {
518518 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
519519 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
520520
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, DeleteColumn) {
563563// Test that a chain of SetCell mutations that initially introduces a
564564// new row, but one of which eventually fails, will end with the whole
565565// row rolled back.
566- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteRow) {
566+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteRow) {
567567 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
568568 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
569569
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, DeleteRow) {
600600// Does the DeleteFromfamily mutation work to delete a row from a
601601// specific family and does it rows with the same row key in other
602602// column families alone?
603- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteFromFamilyBasicFunction) {
603+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteFromFamilyBasicFunction) {
604604 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
605605 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
606606
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, DeleteFromFamilyBasicFunction) {
649649
650650// Test that DeleteFromfamily can be rolled back in case a subsequent
651651// mutation fails.
652- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteFromFamilyRollback) {
652+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteFromFamilyRollback) {
653653 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
654654 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
655655
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ ::google::bigtable::v2::TimestampRange* NewTimestampRange(int64_t start,
716716}
717717
718718// Does DeleteFromColumn basically work?
719- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteFromColumnBasicFunction) {
719+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteFromColumnBasicFunction) {
720720 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
721721 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
722722
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, DeleteFromColumnBasicFunction) {
758758}
759759
760760// Does DeleteFromColumn rollback work?
761- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteFromColumnRollback) {
761+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteFromColumnRollback) {
762762 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
763763 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
764764
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ TEST(TransactonRollback, DeleteFromColumnRollback) {
817817}
818818
819819// Can we delete a row from all column families?
820- TEST (TransactonRollback , DeleteFromRowBasicFunction) {
820+ TEST (TransactionRollback , DeleteFromRowBasicFunction) {
821821 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::Table schema;
822822 ::google::bigtable::admin::v2::ColumnFamily column_family;
823823
0 commit comments