Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Compare the two base models:
|
class BaseModel(pydantic.BaseModel): |
|
class BaseModel(pydantic.BaseModel): |
and those couldn't be any more different.
As a start, the former has model_config that sets reasonable defaults, like alias generation, serialization etc; however the latter does not, which makes it that much harder to use.
Describe the solution you'd like
Have either a single BaseModel, or multiple, but with the reasonable defaults (alias generation, serialization etc).
Describe alternatives you've considered
The only alternative is to sub the hell out of everything and add a model config for each class, which is hardly the best solution.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Compare the two base models:
python-genai/google/genai/_common.py
Line 549 in 610059b
python-genai/google/genai/_interactions/_models.py
Line 113 in 610059b
and those couldn't be any more different.
As a start, the former has
model_configthat sets reasonable defaults, like alias generation, serialization etc; however the latter does not, which makes it that much harder to use.Describe the solution you'd like
Have either a single BaseModel, or multiple, but with the reasonable defaults (alias generation, serialization etc).
Describe alternatives you've considered
The only alternative is to sub the hell out of everything and add a model config for each class, which is hardly the best solution.