docs(python): add GCI91 feasibility report and green metrics - REWORK#482
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds Python-specific feasibility/metrics documentation for rule GCI91 (“filter before sort”) and updates the rules support matrix to reflect that the rule is now considered implementable for Python.
Changes:
- Added a new Python AsciiDoc report for GCI91 with benchmark protocol and green software metrics.
- Updated
RULES.mdto move Python’s GCI91 status from “to analyze” to “to implement”.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/main/rules/GCI91/python/GCI91.asciidoc | Adds a Python-focused feasibility/benchmark report for GCI91. |
| RULES.md | Updates the Python applicability status for GCI91 in the support matrix. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/main/rules/GCI91/python/GCI91.asciidoc:63
- The Python rule document doesn’t include any non-compliant/compliant code examples, which is inconsistent with other Python rule docs (e.g., GCI96/python/GCI96.asciidoc includes explicit examples) and makes the rule harder to apply/implement. Consider adding a short “Code Examples” section showing the sort-then-filter anti-pattern and the filter-then-sort compliant pattern.
== 6. Recommendation
Based on clear empirical evidence tracking hardware power consumption, implementing GCI91 delivers substantial infrastructure relief and carbon reduction without adding syntax complexity. We recommend shifting the rule state to applicable for Python.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| = GCI91 Rule Feasibility and Optimization Report: Use Filter Before Sort | ||
|
|
||
| == 1. Objective and Context | ||
| The purpose of this report is to evaluate the applicability and green software metrics of rule GCI91 (Use filter feature before sort elements) for the Python language. This analysis aims to justify changing its status from pending evaluation to active within the standard matrix. |
| - RAM Energy Draw Optimization: Divided by 4.50 | ||
|
|
||
| == 5. Algorithmic and Structural Analysis | ||
| The massive variance in resource draw is mathematically sound. Python uses Timsort, an adaptive sorting algorithm derived from Merge Sort and Insertion Sort, operating with a worst-case time complexity of O(n log n). |
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



This PR was created from original #459
to rework it and take into account review feedbacks.