fix: exclude UV dev dependencies from SBOMs#480
Merged
Conversation
Implements TC-4096
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
uv exportwas including dev dependencies in the output, causing false positive vulnerability reports (same root cause as fix: exclude Poetry dev dependencies from SBOMs #479 but for the UV provider)--no-devflag to theuv exportcommand[dependency-groups] devsection and tests verifying dev deps are excluded from both stack and component analysisRelates to TC-4096
Test plan
black(dev dep) appeared in UV SBOM before fix--no-devexcludes dev deps from both stack and component analysis--no-devis safe on projects without a dev group (no error)🤖 Generated with Claude Code