Fix bug where the OFFSET function was ignoring the sheet reference in the provided address

[sequba]

Context

Fixed bug where the OFFSET function was ignoring the sheet reference in the provided address.

How did you test your changes?

• new unit tests
• unit tests pass

Types of changes

• Breaking change (a fix or a feature because of which an existing functionality doesn't work as expected anymore)
• New feature or improvement (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• Additional language file, or a change to an existing language file (translations)
• Change to the documentation

Related issues:

1. Fixes [Bug]: Wrong result when referencing a different sheet in OFFSET function #1477

Checklist:

• I have reviewed the guidelines about Contributing to HyperFormula and I confirm that my code follows the code style of this project.
• I have signed the Contributor License Agreement.
• My change is compliant with the OpenDocument standard.
• My change is compatible with Microsoft Excel.
• My change is compatible with Google Sheets.
• I described my changes in the CHANGELOG.md file.
• My changes require a documentation update.
• My changes require a migration guide.

[github-actions]

Performance comparison of head (afbb730) vs base (3cc65df)

                                     testName |   base |   head | change
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Sheet A | 504.64 | 510.97 | +1.25%
                                      Sheet B | 165.47 | 165.15 | -0.19%
                                      Sheet T | 144.54 | 143.81 | -0.51%
                                Column ranges | 512.75 | 510.45 | -0.45%
Sheet A:  change value, add/remove row/column |   15.1 |  13.89 | -8.01%
 Sheet B: change value, add/remove row/column | 131.17 | 131.36 | +0.14%
                   Column ranges - add column |  155.1 | 149.07 | -3.89%
                Column ranges - without batch | 447.39 | 445.06 | -0.52%
                        Column ranges - batch | 116.17 | 115.55 | -0.53%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.22%. Comparing base (3cc65df) to head (afbb730).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1548   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.22%   97.22%           
========================================
  Files          169      169           
  Lines        14524    14526    +2     
  Branches      3169     3171    +2     
========================================
+ Hits         14121    14123    +2     
  Misses         396      396           
  Partials         7        7           

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/parser/FormulaParser.ts	97.61% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.