mailagents-email-runtime/docs/admin-workflow-packs.json at main · haocn-ops/mailagents-email-runtime · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "workflows": [
    {
      "name": "bootstrap_mailbox_agent",
      "goal": "Mint the narrowest viable mailbox-scoped bearer token, then return the agent to the normal mailbox workflow surface.",
      "compositeTool": "bootstrap_mailbox_agent_token",
      "categories": ["token_admin", "registry_admin"],
      "steps": [
        { "tool": "get_mailbox", "mode": "read" },
        { "tool": "get_agent", "mode": "read_optional" },
        { "tool": "bootstrap_mailbox_agent_token", "mode": "privileged" }
      ],
      "sideEffects": ["create_access_token"],
      "stopConditions": [
        "mailbox identity or tenant ownership is unclear",
        "the requested token scope exceeds the mailbox workflow need",
        "the intended agent binding is ambiguous"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "review_tenant_outbound_access",
      "goal": "Gather billing and policy context before deciding whether a tenant should be approved for external send, reset back to review, or suspended.",
      "compositeTool": "get_tenant_review_context",
      "categories": ["policy_admin", "registry_admin"],
      "steps": [
        { "tool": "get_tenant_send_policy", "mode": "read" },
        { "tool": "list_mailboxes", "mode": "read" },
        { "tool": "get_tenant_review_context", "mode": "read" },
        { "tool": "apply_tenant_send_policy_review", "mode": "high_risk" },
        { "tool": "upsert_tenant_send_policy", "mode": "privileged_optional" }
      ],
      "sideEffects": [
        "apply_tenant_send_policy_review",
        "upsert_tenant_send_policy"
      ],
      "stopConditions": [
        "the tenant identity or mailbox inventory is incomplete",
        "payment state is still ambiguous or disputed",
        "the review outcome would broaden outbound access without operator approval"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "forensic_delivery_inspection",
      "goal": "Correlate message, draft, outbound-job, delivery-event, and suppression state before taking remediation actions on a delivery incident.",
      "compositeTool": "inspect_delivery_case",
      "categories": ["debug", "suppression"],
      "steps": [
        { "tool": "get_debug_message", "mode": "read_optional" },
        { "tool": "get_debug_draft", "mode": "read_optional" },
        { "tool": "get_debug_outbound_job", "mode": "read_optional" },
        { "tool": "get_suppression", "mode": "read_optional" },
        { "tool": "inspect_delivery_case", "mode": "read" },
        { "tool": "add_suppression", "mode": "high_risk_optional" }
      ],
      "sideEffects": ["add_suppression"],
      "stopConditions": [
        "the lookup target does not uniquely identify the delivery case",
        "delivery evidence is incomplete and requires provider-side logs",
        "adding a suppression would materially change customer delivery behavior without human review"
      ]
    }
  ]
}