Skip to content

Add Reviewable HTML Workbench#230

Merged
internet-dot merged 1 commit into
hashgraph-online:mainfrom
u-ichi:add-reviewable-html-workbench
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

Add Reviewable HTML Workbench#230
internet-dot merged 1 commit into
hashgraph-online:mainfrom
u-ichi:add-reviewable-html-workbench

Conversation

@u-ichi

@u-ichi u-ichi commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Plugin

  • Name: Reviewable HTML Workbench
  • Category: Development & Workflow
  • Description: Generate reviewable HTML documents, serve previews, collect inline review comments, and feed review outcomes back into agent workflows.

Scanner Results

Checklist

  • Plugin bundle exists under plugins/u-ichi/reviewable-html-workbench/
  • composerIcon field is set in plugin.json interface section
  • Icon file exists at the path referenced by composerIcon
  • README entry is alphabetically sorted
  • Scanner workflow running in plugin repo's GitHub Actions
  • Scanner score >= 80 with no critical/high findings

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request registers a new third-party plugin, Reviewable HTML Workbench, by adding it to the README and providing its metadata configuration and icon. However, the plugin configuration references a skills directory that is missing from the pull request, which needs to be included for the plugin to function properly.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread plugins/u-ichi/reviewable-html-workbench/.codex-plugin/plugin.json
@u-ichi u-ichi force-pushed the add-reviewable-html-workbench branch from c8001ed to fcefba5 Compare June 24, 2026 00:43
- Add README entry (Development & Workflow section)
- Add plugins.json and marketplace.json catalog entries
- Add plugin bundle with skills, LICENSE, and SECURITY.md

Scanner score: 85/100 (B - Good)
CI: https://github.com/u-ichi/reviewable-html-workbench/actions
@u-ichi u-ichi force-pushed the add-reviewable-html-workbench branch from fcefba5 to f685fe2 Compare June 24, 2026 23:40
@u-ichi

u-ichi commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @internet-dot, thanks for the review! I've addressed all four items in the latest push (commit f685fe2):

  1. plugins.json — Added catalog entry
  2. .agents/plugins/marketplace.json — Added marketplace entry
  3. LICENSE — Included in the bundle
  4. SECURITY.md — Included in the bundle

Could you take another look when you get a chance? The CI also needs first-time contributor approval to run. Thanks!

@zerocodefast zerocodefast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All four items from the previous review have been fixed:

  • ✅ entry added
  • ✅ entry added
  • ✅ file added (MIT)
  • ✅ added

Alphabetical position is correct (between Registry Broker and River Review). Good to merge.

@zerocodefast zerocodefast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All four items from the previous review have been fixed:

  • plugins.json entry added
  • marketplace.json entry added
  • LICENSE file added (MIT)
  • SECURITY.md added

Alphabetical position is correct (between Registry Broker and River Review). Good to merge.

@internet-dot internet-dot merged commit f40c8d5 into hashgraph-online:main Jul 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants