3.14 Backport #11127: update time to 1.15

[mergify]

I'm requesting the backport due to commercialhaskell/stackage#7919.

Template B: This PR does not modify behaviour or interface

E.g. the PR only touches documentation or tests, does refactorings, etc.

Include the following checklist in your PR:

• Patches conform to the coding conventions.
• Is this a PR that fixes CI? If so, it will need to be backported to older cabal release branches (ask maintainers for directions).

---

This is an automatic backport of pull request #11127 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

[mergify]

Cherry-pick of 9d8968e has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/3.14/pr-11127
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/3.14'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 9d8968ed2.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   Cabal-syntax/Cabal-syntax.cabal
	both modified:   Cabal/Cabal.cabal
	both modified:   cabal-install/cabal-install.cabal

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

[Mikolaj]

I'm requesting the backport due to commercialhaskell/stackage#7919.

[Mikolaj]

Though maybe this is not really needed?

@juhp: don't you plan to update the cabal version together with GHC version, which would make this bump unnecessary? (And the bump here: commercialhaskell/stackage#7916?) You could update straight to cabal 3.16.1.0, which contains both the bumps.

[juhp]

@Mikolaj right good point - I haven't validated the Stackage input carefully... let me try to regenerate...
It was based on current Nightly constraints

[juhp]

Hopefully better now - thanks for pointing it out

But actually this backport is needed for 3.16.0 :)
Though hopefully we will see 3.16.1 in ghc-9.14.2

[Mikolaj]

But actually this backport is needed for 3.16.0 :) Though hopefully we will see 3.16.1 in ghc-9.14.2

Actually, I'm told GHC 9.14.1 ships with cabal 3.16.0.0 plus two commits, one of them being time dep bump. See https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/26689#note_651728. But that's probably irrelevant for Stackage so, yes, I reckon GHC 9.14.2 will contain Cabal 3.16.1.0 and that will solve all problems.