refactor: standardize Good First Issue label usage

[bhuvan-somisetty]

Description

Standardizes the usage of the "Good First Issue" label across issue templates and related scripts.

• Updated label text to use consistent capitalization ("Good First Issue")
• Ensured no functional or behavioral changes
• Limited scope strictly to label standardization

Related Issue

Fixes #2178

Notes

This PR only modifies label naming consistency and does not introduce any logic changes.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8b041ba6-bd8a-4bc9-8c68-bd4a27b7b69d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce4713d and 1ad9096.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/00-good-first-issue-candidate.yml
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/01-good-first-issue.yml
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/02-beginner-issue.yml
• .github/scripts/bot-gfi-assign-on-comment.js

---

Walkthrough

This pull request standardizes capitalization of the "Good First Issue" label terminology across GitHub issue templates and script documentation. Four files receive capitalization updates to use consistent title casing ("Good First Issue(s)") instead of lowercase variants in description text fields and JSDoc comments.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Issue Templates .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/00-good-first-issue-candidate.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/01-good-first-issue.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/02-beginner-issue.yml	Capitalized "good first issue(s)" to "Good First Issue(s)" in template description text fields for consistent terminology presentation.
Script Documentation .github/scripts/bot-gfi-assign-on-comment.js	Updated JSDoc comment to reference the label using proper casing "Good First Issue" instead of lowercase variant.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Linked Issues check	⚠️ Warning	The PR addresses only capitalization standardization in templates and JSDoc comments, which is a subset of issue #2178's broader scope. The PR does not implement the core requirement to centralize label handling across scripts/workflows or provide testing evidence.	Implement centralized label constant handling across .github scripts [#2178], add script-level validation tests, and include fork-based end-to-end verification with evidence in the PR before requesting review.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'refactor: standardize Good First Issue label usage' directly and clearly describes the main change—standardizing label naming consistency across templates and scripts.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description accurately relates to the changeset, explaining that label text was updated to consistent capitalization across issue templates and scripts with no functional changes.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All four changed files are GitHub template and script files within .github scope; however, only capitalization and JSDoc updates were made, which are narrower than the centralization refactoring required by issue #2178.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

📋 Issue Planner

Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).

View plan for ticket: #2178

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[bhuvan-somisetty]

@exploreriii

Created a fresh PR from updated main with only the required changes for Good First Issue label standardization.

Only the relevant files are changed. Please review when you have time.

[bhuvan-somisetty]

Thanks for the review. I kept this PR intentionally scoped to the four GFI-related files after the previous feedback. Please let me know if maintainers expect this PR to also implement centralized label handling and tests, or if that should be handled separately.

[bhuvan-somisetty]

Thank you for the review and approval!