Add integration page: add step to add codeowner#3216
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe integration page creation checklist in ChangesIntegration Page Creation Checklist
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/documenting/create-page.md (2)
19-19: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winClarify what to add to CODEOWNERS.
The instruction "Add the integration and codeowners to the codeowners file" is ambiguous. Based on the CODEOWNERS format (
path-pattern@owners``), contributors need to add:
- The documentation path for the integration
- The GitHub usernames/teams as codeowners
Consider making this explicit:
-6. Add the integration and codeowners to the [codeowners file](https://github.com/home-assistant/home-assistant.io/blob/next/CODEOWNERS). +6. Add the integration's documentation path and codeowners to the [CODEOWNERS](https://github.com/home-assistant/home-assistant.io/blob/next/CODEOWNERS) file (e.g., `docs/integration-name `@username``).🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/documenting/create-page.md` at line 19, The CODEOWNERS step is ambiguous and should explicitly say to add both the integration documentation path and the GitHub owner entries. Update the instruction near the create-page guidance so it references the relevant integration path pattern and the corresponding usernames or teams, using the CODEOWNERS format in the codeowners file. Keep the wording specific enough that contributors know exactly what path and who to assign.
18-18: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winClarify "brands PR" wording.
"that brands PR" is ambiguous — it could read as "that brand's PR" (possessive singular) or "that brands' PR" (possessive plural). Since this refers to the PR in the brands repository that added the brand assets, consider rephrasing for clarity:
- - In the PR template, add a link to that brands PR. + - In the PR template, add a link to the corresponding brands PR.Or if referring to a specific PR from step above: "add a link to that brand's PR" or "add a link to that PR in the brands repository."
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/documenting/create-page.md` at line 18, The wording in the PR template is ambiguous because “that brands PR” can be read multiple ways; update the sentence in the docs content to clearly refer to the intended PR, using a precise phrase in the create-page guidance such as “that brand’s PR” or “the PR in the brands repository” so readers can identify the correct link to add.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/documenting/create-page.md`:
- Line 19: The CODEOWNERS step is ambiguous and should explicitly say to add
both the integration documentation path and the GitHub owner entries. Update the
instruction near the create-page guidance so it references the relevant
integration path pattern and the corresponding usernames or teams, using the
CODEOWNERS format in the codeowners file. Keep the wording specific enough that
contributors know exactly what path and who to assign.
- Line 18: The wording in the PR template is ambiguous because “that brands PR”
can be read multiple ways; update the sentence in the docs content to clearly
refer to the intended PR, using a precise phrase in the create-page guidance
such as “that brand’s PR” or “the PR in the brands repository” so readers can
identify the correct link to add.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ba3f4422-5b1d-4b3b-bfdd-486bfcaa1051
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/documenting/create-page.md
c0ffeeca7
changed the title
2 participants
Proposed change
Docs: adding an integration page:
Type of change
Checklist
Additional information
Summary by CodeRabbit
CODEOWNERSfile.